Real Time Web Analytics

What the News Isn’t Saying About Vaccine-Autism Studies


[The following is a news analysis and commentary]

A new study this week found no link between vaccines and autism. It instantly made headlines on TV news and popular media everywhere. Many billed it as the final word, “once again,” disproving the notion that vaccines could have anything to do with autism.

What you didn’t learn on the news was that the study was from a consulting firm that lists major vaccine makers among its clients: The Lewin Group.

That potential conflict of interest was not disclosed in the paper published in The New England Journal of Medicine; the study authors simply declare “The Lewin Group operates with editorial independence.”

(As an aside, according to, The Lewin Group’s parent company, UnitedHealth Group, is a key government partner in Obamacare. Its subsidiary QSSI was given the contract to build the federal government’s website. One of its top executives and his family are top Obama donors.)

Conflicts of interest alone do not invalidate a study. But they serve as important context in the relentless effort by pharmaceutical interests and their government partners to discredit the many scientists and studies that have found possible vaccine-autism links.

Many Studies Suggest Possible Vaccine-Autism Links

When the popular press, bloggers and medical pundits uncritically promote a study like The Lewin Group’s, it must confound researchers like Lucija Tomljenovic, Catherine DeSoto, Robert Hitlan, Christopher Shaw, Helen Ratajczak, Boyd Haley, Carolyn Gallagher, Melody Goodman, M.I. Kawashti, O.R. Amin, N.G. Rowehy, T. Minami, Laura Hewitson, Brian Lopresti, Carol Stott, Scott Mason, Jaime Tomko, Bernard Rimland, Woody McGinnis, K. Shandley and D.W. Austin.

They are just a few of the many scientists whose peer-reviewed, published works have found possible links between vaccines and autism. But unlike The Lewin Group’s study, their research has not been endorsed and promoted by the government and, therefore, has not been widely reported in the media. In fact, news reports, blogs and “medical experts” routinely claim no such studies exist.

To be clear: no study to date conclusively proves or disproves a causal link between vaccines and autism and—despite the misreporting—none has claimed to do so. Each typically finds either (a) no association or (b) a possible association on a narrow vaccine-autism question. Taken as a whole, the research on both sides serves as a body of evidence.

The Astroturf Propaganda Campaign

It’s theoretically possible that all of the studies supporting a possible link between vaccines and autism are wrong. And, if the propagandists are to be believed, each of the researchers is an incompetent crank, quack, nut or fraud (and, of course, “anti-vaccine” for daring to dabble in research that attempts to solve the autism puzzle and leads to vaccine safety issues). The scientists and their research are “controversial,” simply because the propagandists declare them to be.

The disparaged scientists include well-published neurologists, pharmacists, epidemiologists, immunologists, PhD’s, chemists and microbiologists from places like Boston Children’s Hospital, Horizon Molecular Medicine at Georgia State University, University of British Columbia, City College of New York, Columbia University, Stony Brook University Medical Center, University of Northern Iowa, University of Michigan, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Al Azhar University of Cairo, Kinki University in Japan, the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Swinburne University of Technology in Australia, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology in Poland, Department of Child Health Care, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University in China, Utah State University and many more.

Their work is, at best, ignored by the media; at worst, viciously attacked by the predictable flock of self-appointed expert “science” bloggers who often title their blogs with the word “science” or “skeptics” to confer an air of legitimacy.

This astroturf movement, in my opinion, includes but is not limited to: LeftBrainRightBrain, ScienceBlogs, NeuroSkeptic, ScienceBasedMedicine, LizDitz, ScienceBasedMedicine, CrooksandLiars, RespectfulInsolence, HealthNewsReview, SkepticalRaptor, Skepticblog,, Wired, BrianDeer, SethMnookin, Orac, Every Child by Two, the vaccine industry supported American Academy of Pediatrics, and the government/corporate funded American Council on Science and Health (once called “Voodoo Science, Twisted Consumerism” by the watchdog Center for Science in the Public Interest).

This circle operates with the moral support of the vaccine industry and its government partners, citing one another’s flawed critiques as supposed proof that each study has been “debunked,” though the studies continue to appear in peer-reviewed, published journals and in the government’s own National Institutes of Health library.

“Weak,” “too small,” “haphazard,” “not replicated,” “junk science,” “flawed,” “unrelated,” declare the propagandists, without exception. Just as attackers spent years challenging any study that linked tobacco to lung cancer.

They know that reporters who don’t do their homework will conduct an Internet search, run across the blogs with science-y sounding names, and uncritically accept their word as if it’s fact and prevailing thought.

CDC claims “no link” between vaccines and autism

A Small Sampling

Many of the studies have common themes regarding a subset of susceptible children with immunity issues who, when faced with various vaccine challenges, end up with brain damage described as autism.

“Permanent brain damage” is an acknowledged, rare side effect of vaccines; there’s no dispute in that arena. The question is whether the specific form of autism brain injury after vaccination is in any way related to vaccination.

So what are a few of these published studies supporting a possible link between vaccines and autism?

As far back as 1998, a serology study by the College of Pharmacy at University of Michigan supported the hypothesis that an autoimmune response from the live measles virus in MMR vaccine “may play a causal role in autism.” (Nothing to see here, say the critics, that study is old.)

In 2002, a Utah State University study found that “an inappropriate antibody response to MMR [vaccine], specifically the measles component thereof, might be related to pathogenesis of autism.” (“Flawed and non-replicable,” insist the propagandists.)

Also in 2002, the Autism Research Institute in San Diego looked at a combination of vaccine factors. Scientists found the mercury preservative thimerosal used in some vaccines (such as flu shots) could depress a baby’s immunity. That could make him susceptible to chronic measles infection of the gut when he gets MMR vaccine, which contains live measles virus. (The bloggers say it’s an old study, and that other studies contradict it.)

In 2006, a team of microbiologists in Cairo, Egypt concluded, “deficient immune response to measles, mumps and rubella vaccine antigens might be associated with autism, as a leading cause or a resulting event.”

A 2007 study found statistically significant evidence suggesting that boys who got the triple series Hepatitis B vaccine when it contained thimerosal were “more susceptible to developmental disability” than unvaccinated boys.

Similarly, a 5-year study of 79,000 children by the same institution found boys given Hepatitis B vaccine at birth had a three times increased risk for autism than boys vaccinated later or not at all. Nonwhite boys were at greatest risk. (“Weak study,” say the critics.)

A 2009 study in The Journal of Child Neurology found a major flaw in a widely-cited study that claimed no link between thimerosal in vaccines and autism. Their analysis found that “the original p value was in error and that a significant relation does exist between the blood levels of mercury and diagnosis of an autism spectrum disorder.”

The researchers noted, “Like the link between aspirin and heart attack, even a small effect can have major health implications. If there is any link between autism and mercury, it is absolutely crucial that the first reports of the question are not falsely stating that no link occurs.”

(Critics: the study is not to be believed.)FDA list of thimerosal-containing vaccines

A 2010 rat study by the Polish Academy of Sciences suggested “likely involvement” of thimerosal in vaccines (such as flu shots) “in neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism.” (The critics dismiss rat studies.)

In 2010, a pilot study in Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis found that infant monkeys given the 1990’s recommended pediatric vaccine regimen showed important brain changes warranting “additional research into the potential impact of an interaction between the MMR and thimerosal-containing vaccines on brain structure and function.”

A study from Japan’s Kinki University in 2010 supported “the possible biological plausibility for how low-dose exposure to mercury from thimerosal-containing vaccines may be associated with autism.”

A 2011 study from Australia’s Swinburne University supported the hypothesis that sensitivity to mercury, such as thimerosal in flu shots, may be a genetic risk factor for autism. (Critics call the study “strange” with “logical hurdles.”)

A Journal of Immunotoxicology review in 2011 by a former pharmaceutical company senior scientist concluded autism could result from more than one cause including encephalitis (brain damage) following vaccination. (Critics say she reviewed “debunked and fringe” science.)

In 2011, City University of New York correlated autism prevalence with increased childhood vaccine uptake. “Although mercury has been removed from many vaccines, other culprits may link vaccines to autism,” said the study’s lead author. (To critics, it’s “junk science.”)

A University of British Columbia study in 2011 that found “the correlation between Aluminum [an adjuvant] in vaccines and [autism] may be causal.” (More “junk science,” say the propagandists.)

A 2011 rat study out of Warsaw, Poland found thimerosal in vaccines given at a young age could contribute to neurodevelopmental disorders. (Proves nothing, say critics.)

A Chinese study in 2012 suggested that febrile seizures (an acknowledged side effect of some vaccines) and family history of neuropsychiatric disorders correlate with autistic regression.

A 2012 study from the Neurochemistry Research Marie Curie Chairs Program in Poland found that newborn exposure to vaccines with thimerosal (such as flu shots) might cause gluten-related brain injuries.

In 2013, neurosurgeons at the Methodist Neurological Institute found that children with mild mitochondrial defect may be highly susceptible to toxins like the vaccine preservative thimerosal found in vaccines such as flu shots. (“Too small” of a study, say the critics.)

Then, there’s a 2004 Columbia University study presented at the Institute of Medicine. It found that mice predisposed for genetic autoimmune disorder developed autistic-like behavior after receiving mercury-containing vaccines. (Critics say that’s not proof, and the work was not replicable.)

There’s Dr. William Thompson, the current CDC senior scientist who has come forward with an extraordinary statement to say that he and his agency have engaged in long term efforts to obscure a study’s significant link between vaccines and autism, heightened in African Americans boys. (The CDC says the data changes made were for legitimate reasons.)

There’s the current CDC immunization safety director who acknowledged to me that it’s possible vaccines may rarely trigger autism in children who are biologically or genetically susceptible to vaccine injury.

There’s the case of Hannah Poling, in which the government secretly admitted multiple vaccines given in one day triggered her brain injuries, including autism, then paid a multi-million dollar settlement, and had the case sealed from the prying public eyes under a confidentiality order.

There was the former head of the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Bernadine Healy, who stoked her peers’ ire by publicly stating that the vaccine-autism link was not a “myth” as so many tried to claim. She disclosed that her colleagues at the Institute of Medicine did not wish to investigate the possible link because they feared the impact it would have on the vaccination program.

There’s former CDC researcher Poul Thorsen, whose studies dispelled a vaccine autism link. He’s now a “most wanted fugitive” after being charged with 13 counts of wire fraud and nine counts of money laundering for allegedly using CDC grants of tax dollars to buy a house and cars for himself.

And there are the former scientists from Merck, maker of the MMR vaccine in question, who have turned into whistleblowers and accuse their company of committing vaccine fraud.

Read: CDC Vaccine Information Statements

The Spin

If you want to review research and evidence on the other side, a simple Internet search will easily turn up everything you want to know. Those studies always seem to get covered in the news. They somehow turn up first in Google search results, along with the reports and blogs disparaging all opposing science and news reporting.

You might run across a February article in the New York Times. It treated the vaccine autism theory as if it comes down to a disagreement between emotionally fragile parents of autistic children and real research: “faith” and “feeling” versus hard science.

“Some parents feel certain that vaccines can lead to autism,” stated the article, and “the vaccine-autism link has continued to be accepted on faith by some.”

You might run across this network news story that uses Dr. Paul Offit as an expert on vaccine safety. He’s introduced as “director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia” and he “denies a connection with vaccination and autism.”

Somehow, it goes unreported that Offit has made millions (he won’t disclose exactly how much) inventing a vaccine for Merck, which makes the MMR vaccine in question. Offit’s rotavirus vaccine has, itself, been the subject of safety concerns. And his employment at Children’s Hospital has been funded in part by $1.5 million given by Merck. In addition, he got caught giving false and disparaging information regarding a report I did exposing his financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry he so vigorously defends. His false statements were corrected by the publication that originally reported them. And Offit and his book publisher settled a libel accusation by a vaccine safety advocate who accused Offit of fabricating a disparaging conversation in his book: Autism’s False Prophets. Offit agreed to apologize, correct the book and make a donation to an autism charity.

But to the news: none of that matters. Offit is simply presented as an unbiased expert.

The supposedly best medical experts in the world who deny vaccines have anything to do with autism remain at an utter loss to explain this generation’s epidemic. To declare the science “settled” and the debate “over” is to defy the plain fact that many scientists worldwide are still sorting through it, and millions of people are still debating it.

The body of evidence on both sides is open to interpretation. People have every right to disbelieve the studies on one side. But it is disingenuous to pretend they do not exist. vaccine reporting

CDC recommended vaccine schedules

Vaccine court injury and claim statistics

POLITICAL STATEMENT – Heistclick PayDay Monsanto


Doctors Against Vaccines – Hear From Those Who Have Done the Research


The general public shares a common misconception – that all doctors, or s” support vaccination. Although it is true that the majority of doctors support vaccines, not all do.

Most doctors blindly support the recommendations of the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics. Doctors are trained in administering vaccines, not in how they are made. There are some doctors that choose to do the research themselves in order to develop an informed opinion on the subject. These doctors who become knowledgeable about vaccines usually become anti-vaccine. A little knowledge goes a long way.

Without a doubt we live in the age of autism, but it is also the age of chronic illness. One in eighty-eight children are diagnosed with autism, while half of all children now struggle with chronic illnesses such as asthma, diabetes, ADHD, etc. This rise in illness correlates with the dramatic increase in vaccines given to our children along with a growing exposure to other toxic chemicals.

Dr. Russell Blaylock

Dr. Russell Blaylock

Dr. Blaylock is a man who wears many hats. He is a board certified neurosurgeon who owns a nutritional practice. Dr. Blaylock is a health practitioner, lecturer, and author. He practiced medicine for 25 years before pursuing his nutritional studies and research full time.

What Happens to the Brain With Vaccination?

It seems the brain is always neglected when pharmacologists consider side effects of various drugs. The same is true for vaccinations. For a long time no one considered the effect of repeated vaccinations on the brain. This was based on a mistaken conclusion that the brain was protected from immune activation by its special protective gateway called the blood-brain barrier. More recent studies have shown that immune cells can enter the brain directly, and more importantly, the brain’s own special immune system can be activated by vaccination.

You see, the brain has a special immune system that operates through a unique type of cell called a microglia.

These tiny cells are scattered throughout the brain, lying dormant waiting to be activated. In fact, they are activated by many stimuli and are quite easy to activate. For our discussion, activation of the body’s immune system by vaccination is a most important stimuli for activation of brain microglia.

Numerous studies have shown that when the body’s immune system is activated, the brain’s immune cells are likewise activated. This occurs by several pathways, not important to this discussion. The more powerfully the body’s immune system is stimulated the more intense is the brain’s reaction. Prolonged activation of the body’s immune system likewise produces prolonged activation of the brain’s immune system.

Therein lies the danger of our present vaccine policy.

The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practice have both endorsed a growing list of vaccines for children, even newborns, as well as yearly flu shots for both children and adults. Children are receiving as many as 22 inoculations before attending school.

What Happens When the Brain’s Immune System is Activated?

The brain’s immune system cells, once activated, begin to move about the nervous system, secreting numerous immune chemicals (called cytokines and chemokines) and pouring out an enormous amount of free radicals in an effort to kill invading organisms. The problem is–there are no invading organisms. It has been tricked by the vaccine into believing there are.

Unlike the body’s immune system, the microglia also secrete two other chemicals that are very destructive of brain cells and their connecting processes. These chemicals, glutamate and quinolinic acid, are called excitotoxins. They also dramatically increase free radical generation in the brain. Studies of patients have shown that levels of these two excitotoxins can rise to very dangerous levels in the brain following viral and bacterial infections of the brain. High quinolinic acid levels in the brain are thought to be the cause of the dementia seen with HIV infection.

The problem with our present vaccine policy is that so many vaccines are being given so close together and over such a long period that the brain’s immune system is constantly activated. This has been shown experimentally in numerous studies. This means that the brain will be exposed to large amounts of the excitotoxins as well as the immune cytokines over the same period.

Studies on all of these disorders, even in autism, have shown high levels of immune cytokines and excitotoxins in the nervous system. These destructive chemicals, as well as the free radicals they generate, are diffused throughout the nervous system doing damage, a process called bystander injury. It’s sort of like throwing a bomb in a crowd. Not only will some be killed directly by the blast, but those far out into the radius of the explosion will be killed by shrapnel.

Normally, the brain’s immune system, like the body’s, activates quickly and then promptly shuts off to minimize the bystander damage. Vaccination won’t let the microglia shut down. In the developing brain, this can lead to language problems, behavioral dysfunction, and even dementia. In the adult, it can lead to the Gulf War Syndrome or one of the more common neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s dementia, or Lou Gehrig’s disease (ALS).

Dr. Jay Gordon

Dr. Jay Gordon

In 1980, I abandoned the recommended vaccine schedule. I received dozens and dozens of phone calls from moms and dads reporting that their child had received shots a couple of days ago and they were acting a little different. They couldn’t quite put their finger on it but their child was just not acting quite the same as before I gave the shots. They’d ask if this was okay…was it normal? Initially, as I was trained to do, I replied yes. After dozens and dozens and dozens of phone calls, I decided that I had better listen to these moms a lot more.

I stopped some vaccines. I delayed others.

No, I am not ‘anti-vaccination.’

I am aware of the public health implications of completely abandoning our current vaccine schedule, and I certainly don’t advocate that. What I really want is an honest discussion of the risks and benefits of each vaccine and combinations of vaccines for your child. Just your child. My experience is that many parents don’t have the opportunity to discuss these concepts and these details with their doctors.

As you can see, Dr. Gordon really isn’t all that anti-vaccine. He’s been made famous because he is the doctor that is treating Jenny McCarthy’s son, and she isn’t all that anti-vaccine either. Dr. Gordon has earned himself a reputation for being anti-vaccine because he is against some vaccines and the current recommended vaccine schedule.

Dr. Suzanne Humphries

Dr. Suzanne Humphries

I am a conventionally educated medical doctor who was a participant in the conventional system from 1989 until 2011.  During those years I saw how often that approach fails patients and creates new diseases.

I left conventional medicine to research the many problems with mainstream medical theory.

I do not consider it my place to tell anyone whether to vaccinate or not. It is my place to understand as much as I can about vaccines and give people a more complete understanding from which to make their choices. This has never been a priority to the public health services. In fact there is ample documentation that the priority was quite the opposite, and actually to quell ‘any possible doubts, whether well founded or not’ regarding vaccines.

The following document is the American 1984 DHHS federal register, which listed final rules pertaining to the polio vaccination campaigns in USA after three decades of scandal and misinformation.

vaccine article

That priority has placed many lives in jeopardy as major problems with vaccination were and are overlooked by vaccine policy makers.

There are many problems with the science that underpins vaccine information. I’ve yet to meet a pediatrician who is informed enough to offer informed consent. Infant immunity has been misunderstood by immunologists, as the immunology literature admits to. Only recently have some important questions been answered about why infant immune systems don’t function like adult ones. There is good reason for the tolerance that an infant has, and the answer is not to interrupt the program with aluminum and vaccines to ramp it up. That is now known to have long term consequences.

There is a paucity of studies comparing never vaccinated children, with partially or fully vaccinated children. In terms of safety studies, a major issue is that most vaccine studies use another vaccine as the control placebo, or use the background substance of the vaccine.  There is only one recent study (Cowling 2012) where a true saline placebo was used, rather than another vaccine or the carrier fluid containing everything except the main antigen. That study showed no difference in influenza viral infection between groups but astonishingly it revealed a 5-6 times higher rate of non-influenza viral infections in the vaccinated. It is no small wonder more true placebos are not used in vaccine research.

Dr. Tenpenny, D.O.

Dr. Tenpenny, D.O.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is ardently anti-vaccine. She has spent countless hours researching the vaccine debate, and she is familiar with all of the arguments for and against. She is adamantly against vaccines. She, like the other doctors on this list, has been accused of cashing in on vaccine fears, but which side of the debate is really making more money?

It continually breaks my heart that people have to personally experience a severe vaccine injury – or observe a serious reaction in someone they love  – before they wake up to the absolute truth: vaccines can and do cause harm. They have heard the arguments and the stories from others. They ignored the pleas about risks and poo-pooed the concerns about vaccine reactions put forth by concerned friends. Instead, they trusted their uninformed pediatrician or caved under the pressure of their badgering RN mother-in-law.

And now, they are left holding the bag, so to speak: a terrible tragedy and a lifetime of medical care and medical bills, as they watch their loved one’s health deteriorate before their helpless, regretful, angry eyes. Gardasil alone has had more than 38,000 adverse events reported through March, 2015. And that number is estimated to be only 10% of all actual adverse events.  documents case, after expensive case, of injured girls with huge medical bills after this vaccine – and Gardasil is only one of 16 vaccines given to children. How many dollars are actually spent on vaccine injuries, looking for a diagnosis, paying for medications and desperately trying to find a way to reverse the damage? The true cost of vaccination is more than the cost of buying and administering vaccines. The untold tens of millions spent on injuries are not included in the calculations.

Dr. Andrew Wakefield

Dr. Andrew Wakefield

Dr. Wakefield is a gastroenterologist and researcher who followed the evidence where it lead him. In 1998, Wakefield, Prof. John Walker Smith, Dr. Simon Burch, and 10 other co-authors published a paper in the Lancet, a British Medical Journal, which showed a possible correlation between the MMR vaccine and resultant gastrointestinal dysfunction along with developmental delays and autism. Though the paper did not state a conclusive causal effect, it did state the need for further study into the possibility that the MMR shot was to blame. Wakefield went on to publicly bring attention to the possibility, criticizing the MMR shot and calling for separation of the three vaccines.

Read any pro-vaccine article that disputes the link between vaccinations and autism and chances are Andrew Wakefield and this fraudulent study will be mentioned. His offense wasn’t so much being a vaccine separatist so much as him questioning the vaccine dogma. This also made him big pharma enemies.

Dr. Wakefield was accused of fraud, and subsequently lost his medical license. Dubbed the father of the anti-vaccine movement, Wakefield has been both revered and vilified, depending on which side of the argument uses his name. The bizarre thing is, he is not anti-vaccine. He is, however, a critic of the MMR vaccine and has publicly stated that the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines should be given separately.

In 1999, I proposed that the MMR-autism risk may, in part, be a function of age of exposure: the younger you get the vaccine the greater the risk. Why? Because, the younger you get measles, the greater the risk of an adverse outcome. This idea was shared with the CDC. They tested the hypothesis in children in the Atlanta Metro area and they found it to be true.

They found beyond a shadow of a doubt that two subgroups of children were at risk: children who were in effect developmentally normal to age 1 and black boys. They concealed this risk for 13 years and deceived everyone, putting millions of children at risk. In the words of Dr. William Thompson, the senior scientist responsible for this study, for the data analysis, and for disclosure of the fraud: I was involved in deceiving millions of tax payers regarding the potential negative side effects of vaccines.

I have filed a formal complaint with the Office of Research Integrity detailing the fraud. It is provided for you to examine. The matter is currently under investigation by the US Congress with the prospect of hearings later this year.

Dr. Lawrence Palevsky

Dr. Lawrence Palevsky

I did not turn my back when I heard parent after parent – in the dozens, in the hundreds, and then in the thousands – start to say that their children were fine, then they got vaccinated, and then something really bad happened to them acutely or within days, weeks, or even months. Those parents were told 100 percent of the time by the conventional medical system, ‘It’s a coincidence. It couldn’t possibly be related to the vaccine.

As a person who’s curious about science and questioning, it became obvious to me that there may not be a coincidence here and that something more may be going on.

The literature is pretty supportive of the fact that vaccines have much greater adverse outcomes on the genotype of the body, the immune system of the body, the brain of the body, and the intracellular functions of the body than we are willing to tell the public about.

Pro-vaccine advocates argue that there are thousands of studies that prove that vaccines are safe. Dr. Palevsky explains why those studies are flawed.

…in order for us to really delve into those studies, we have to look at who supported the studies. What was the study design? What were the control groups? How big was the actual number of kids or adults that was used in those studies? I think we will see that in most of those studies, the actual safety has never really been proven.

One of the reasons that I think we can fairly say that is that the vaccine manufacturers and the conventional medical organizations have not done studies that compare vaccinated to unvaccinated children. In order for us to really know if children who were vaccinated are having an adverse effect from a vaccine, we have to use a placebo group that’s given an injection of maybe normal saline to evaluate whether or not they developed the same symptoms that children who were vaccinated may develop after they’re injected with the vaccine.

Those studies are not done. They’re not done because the conventional medical system says it’s unethical to leave kids unvaccinated for any length of time. But, most of the vaccine safety studies that are being done last anywhere between one and four weeks anyway. The kids are followed within those one to four weeks. Then, they’re not followed in a very detailed way to recognize whether any of their health outcomes could be related to the vaccine that they got one to four weeks ago.

What ends up happening is they compare the incidence rates of these vaccine reactions or these symptoms that kids get after they’re vaccinated to how often those symptoms are seen in the general population, to check and see if this vaccinated group is in any way getting an increased incidence of these symptoms than the general population would get. But the fact of the matter is that the general population is vaccinated, so they’re comparing a vaccinated group with a vaccinated group.

Dr. Buchwald, M.D.

The decline in infectious diseases in developed countries had nothing to do with vaccinations, but with the decline in poverty and hunger.

Dr. Glen Dettman

It is pathetic and ludicrous to say we ever vanquished smallpox with vaccines, when only 10% of the population was ever vaccinated.

Dr. Archie Kalokerinos, M.D.

Up to 90% of the total decline in the death rate of children between 1860-1965 because of whooping cough, scarlet fever, diphtheria, and measles occurred before the introduction of immunizations and antibiotics.

Dr. Mendelsohn, M.D.

My suspicion, which is shared by others in my profession, is that the nearly 10,000 SIDS deaths that occur in the United States each year are related to one or more of the vaccines that are routinely given children. The pertussis vaccine is the most likely villain, but it could also be one or more of the others.

Peter Baratosy, M.D. PhD, Australia

I see many children in my practice. I see the difference between the immunized and the non-immunized. The non-vaccinated are much healthier and have less infections, colds, otis media, and tonsillitis.

John B.Classen, M.D., M.B.A.

My data proves that the studies used to support immunization are so flawed that it is impossible to say if immunization provides a net benefit to anyone or to society in general. This question can only be determined by proper studies, which have never been performed. The flaw of previous studies is that there was no long-term follow-up and chronic toxicity was not looked at. The American Society of Microbiology has promoted my research…and thus acknowledges the need for proper studies.

Raymond Obomsawin, M.D.

Delay of DPT immunization until 2 years of age in Japan has resulted in a dramatic decline in adverse side effects. In the period of 1970-1974, when DPT vaccination was begun at 3 to 5 months of age, the Japanese national compensation system paid out claims for 57 permanent severe damage vaccine cases, and 37 deaths. During the ensuing six-year period 1975-1980, when DPT injections were delayed to 24 months of age, severe reactions from the vaccine were reduced to a total of eight with three deaths. This represents an 85 to 90 percent reduction in severe cases of damage and death.

Dr. Howard Weiner, Immunologist, Harvard Medical School

If a person has a tendency towards a disease, at a certain age, a vaccine might make him/her more susceptible later when other challenges come along.

Philip Incao, M.D. Testimony on the Hepatitis Vaccine, Ohio 3/1/99

A critical point, which is never mentioned by those advocating mass vaccination is that children’s health has declined significantly since 1960 when vaccines began to be widely used. According to the National Health Interview Survey conducted annually…a shocking 31% of US children today have chronic health problems… In my medical career, I’ve treated vaccinated and unvaccinated children, and the unvaccinated were far healthier and more robust. Allergies, asthma, and behavioral and attention disturbances were clearly more common in my young patients who were vaccinated.

Mary N. Megson, M.D.

Autism may be a disorder linked to the disruption of the G-alpha protein, affecting retinoid receptors in the brain. A study of sixty autistic children suggests that autism may be caused by inserting a G-alpha protein defect, the pertussis toxin found in the D.P.T. vaccine, into genetically at-risk children.

Guylaine Lanctot M.D.

The medical authorities keep lying. Vaccination has been a disaster on the immune system. It actually causes a lot of illnesses. We are changing our genetic code through vaccination.

Dr. Kalokerinos, M.D.

It was similar with the measles vaccination. They went through Africa, South America and elsewhere, and vaccinated sick and starving children…They thought they were wiping out measles, but most of those susceptible to measles died from some other disease that they developed as a result of being vaccinated. The vaccination reduced their immune levels and acted like an infection. Many got septicaemia, gastro-enteritis, etcetera, or made their nutritional status worse and they died from malnutrition. So there were very few susceptible infants left alive to get measles. It’s one way to get good statistics, kill all those that are susceptible, which is what they literally did.


The AMA has always been corrupt. Just look back at their old recommendations for smoking tobacco. The AMA has also been sued for maintaining an illegal boycott of chiropractors. Their expert advice has always been for sale to the highest bidder. The CDC is no different. Recently they’ve been outed for covering up the link between the MMR vaccine and autism in African American children. Their advisory board is filled with industry insiders promoting their own self-interest. The AAP seems to be working primarily for vaccine manufacturers.

There are two kinds of pro-vaccine experts; those who regurgitate pro-vaccine rhetoric and those who are getting paid by pharmaceutical industries. Most regulators are the second kind of expert. (We all know money talks, and big money yells). You cannot do all of the research and come to the conclusion that vaccines are safe. Those that do the research invariably reject all vaccines, or refuse many of them.

Further Reading:

OPPOSE SB 792 OPPOSE MANDATED VACCINATIONS For Early ChildHood Educators. preschool teachers. Home DayCare Owners. ALL Child Care Employees.

SB 792 Daycare worker vaccinations

CALIFORNIA POSED TO BE THE FIRST STATE TO REQUIRE STATE MANDATED VACCINATIONS FOR ALL CHILDCARE WORKERS including all private and public school early childhood education programs (Headstart, Private preK and preschools), family daycares and daycare centers. *Any school, care facility regulated by community care licensing. 

ALL employed Adults must be up-to-date on each vaccine listed on CDC’s adult immunization schedule (except HPV) or be denied employment.

SB 792, would eliminate an adult’s right to exempt themselves from one, some, or all vaccines, a risk-laden medical procedure.

This bill eliminate medical autonomy, crushes religious freedom, undermines personal freedom and burdens quality providers with <span “font-size:11.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;=”” line-height:150%;font-family:”abadi=”” light”;mso-fareast-font-family:=”” メイリオ;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;mso-bidi-font-family:”times=”” roman”;=”” mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;mso-ansi-language:en-us;mso-fareast-language:=”” en-us;mso-bidi-language:ar-sa”=””>a non-optional series of medical interventions in the form of mandated vaccines that is neither 100 % nor 100% effective.

Bill excerpt: This bill, commencing September 1, 2016, would prohibit a day care center or a family day care home from employing any person who has not been immunized in accordance with the schedule for routine adult immunizations, prescribed by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The bill would specify circumstances under which a person would be exempt from the immunization requirement, based on medical safety and current immunity, as specified. The bill would make conforming changes to provisions that set forth qualifications for day care center teachers and applicants for licensure as a family day care center. Because the bill would extend the application of a crime under the act, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

*limited exemptions: Section 41597.622. (a) Commencing September 1, 2016, a person shall not be employed at a family day care home if he or she has not been immunized according to the schedule for routine adult immunizations, as recommended by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, with the exception of vaccination for human papillomavirus (HPV).

Bill Status:
05/22/15 SB792 (Mendoza) passed the Senate with 34 Ayes, 3 Noes and 2 abstaining votes. The bill was referred to Assembly Rules where it awaits Assembly Committee assignment for upcoming hearings.
Senate Vote:
Ayes: Allen, Bates, Beall, Berryhill, Block, Cannella, De León, Gaines, Galgiani, Hall, Hancock, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Jackson, Lara, Leno, Leyva, Liu, McGuire, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Nguyen, Nielsen, Pan, Pavley, Roth, Runner, Stone, Vidak, Wieckowski, Wolk
Noes: Anderson, Moorlach, Morrell
No Votes Recorded: Fuller, Huff


A Few Reasons Adults Reject Mandated Vaccination

      • MMR & CHICKEN POX are live virus vaccines. Recently vaccinated teachers caring for newborns & toddlers will expose them to the diseases.     
      • The flu vaccine, which is on the required list, was only 19% effective last year. Many strains still contain thimerosal, a form of mercury. Others contain aluminum, which is a neurotoxin. Recently a batch of flu vaccines was recalled, reportedly due to low potency.
      • Most workers in the field are female, many in child bearing ages. All shots have not been tested on pregnant women, but that doesn’t qualify you for a medical exemption.
      • Vaccines are against many individuals’ moral and religious convictions. In addition to aborted fetal tissue, some residents of California believe that God does not want their bodies injected with neurotoxins, heavy metals, animal tissues, genetically modified organisms, live or attenuated viruses, cleansers, adjuvants, stabilizers, preservatives, etc. They believe that those substances compromise their immune systems and destroy their health.  – see Religious Rights Violation

– See more at:

      • Pharmaceutical companies are NOT liable for vaccine reactions: The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 established the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) as a federal no-fault system to compensate persons (or families of persons) who are injured by childhood vaccines, has paid out over $3 billion to families whose children have died or suffered other adverse reactions. In the past 5 years, an average of $221,000,000 has been paid out per year, which has nearly tripled from years before. Recipients of compensation are not allowed to speak of their case after it’s been settled. Manufacturers and the doctors who administer vaccines are completely shielded from liability for vaccine injuries and deaths.

      • Adverse reactions are more common than widely perceived: Managed by the CDC and FDA, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reports more than 30,000 vaccine related injuries annually. Since 2000, 142 Californians have suffered severe adverse reactions, resulting in 46 deaths of California citizens.  In that same time period, VAERS reported the deaths of 707 American citizensVaccines fail sometimes where even fully vaccinated people become infected.  Nobody can predict who will or will not respond to vaccines. – See Vaccine Failure
      • Big Pharma has a fraudulent history: In the past 5 years, drug makers have paid the U.S. Government $19.2 billion in criminal and civil fraud penalties. EVERY SINGLE MAKER of vaccines has pled guilty to FRAUD. Yet, we are expected to believe them when they say their product in which they pocket billions of dollars – is safe. Skepticism of the pharmaceutical industry is well deserved, and it doesn’t imply skepticism of science. Furthermore, two former Merck virologists now whistleblowers allege that Merck falsified data with the MMR II vaccine in order to meet the required 95% efficacy rate. This, along with other evidence, suggests the possibility that vaccine failure is a contributing factor for annual outbreaks. -see Vaccine Fraud


This bill restricts the opportunities for quality providers to remain in such a low paying and often unappreciated career. Before I could begin my very first job as a daycare teacher, I had to have 12 units of ECE coursework, CPR and first aid training, fingerprinting, and a TB test. I then earned minimum wage for the first two years of my employment. Adding the burden of undergoing a non-optional series of medical interventions in the form of mandated vaccines is not acceptable nor warranted.
– Barbara Matessa

California Facebook Community
Oppose SB 792

National Organizations 
Vaccine Impact
National Vaccine Information Center

California’s SB 277 is a form of medical genocide targeting genetically vulnerable children


As some senators in California continue to press onward in trying to eliminate the right of parents to opt their children out of “mandatory” vaccinations, those with vulnerable, or what some have deemed “faulty,” genetics are sounding the alarm about how the potential passage of Senate Bill 277 will put them at a massively increased risk of suffering permanent health damage.

Just like certain foods and herbs exert varying effects on people based on their individual genetic makeups, vaccines can cause serious damage in people with genetic “defects” that impair the body’s ability to neutralize and eliminate toxins. One such “defect” involves genetic mutations to the MTHFR C677T enzyme, which is directly responsible for fueling the electron transport chain in the methylation cycle.

Put more simply, this genetic mutation impairs the ability of those who have it to detoxify environmental stressors like chemicals in the air and water, food additives, bacteria, pharmaceutical drugs and, yes, the adjuvants and other chemical additives used in nearly every vaccine. What this means for those with this mutation is that their bodies will continue to accumulate toxins over time, leading to increasingly serious chronic health problems as a result of this unprecedented vaccine violence.

“Did you know that [approximately] 15% of the general population have 2 mutations in the MTHFR C677T enzyme which means they are unable to remove most toxins from their body?” wrote one concerned Natural News reader about the push to pass SB 277. “Approximately 40% [of people] of Mexican descent, [approximately] 30% [of people] of Italian descent, [and approximately] 40% [of people] of French Canadian descent have inherited both MTHFR C677T enzyme defects, one from each parent.”

“It is like having a 30 year old car that has rarely had its oil changed, your body can only excrete 20-30% of toxins and hold on to the rest and then the toxins accumulate in the body and cause all sorts of health problems.”

The last thing people with MTHFR need is to be forcibly injected with toxic mercury, aluminum, squalene and other deadly chemicals
More on this peculiar genetic condition is available in the links below, but suffice it to say that the purveyors of SB 277 clearly haven’t considered how their draconian proposal to force all California schoolchildren to be jabbed with chemicals might severely harm those with inherent weaknesses in their bodies’ ability to detoxify these chemicals, as well as produce the energy needed to live.

Methylation is a vital bodily process responsible for eliminating toxins, stress hormones, histamines, and xenobiotics. This process is supported by eating only clean, healthy foods; getting plenty of sleep; eliminating and defecating at least twice a day; exercising; drinking plenty of clean water; and in many cases supplementing with the right nutrients.

But for those with MTHFR C677T enzyme mutations, it often takes a whole lot more to maintain a reasonable quality of life, including not being forced into accepting vaccines loaded with toxic mercury, aluminum, squalene and other deadly poisons.

“If these senators sincerely believe that mandatory vaccinations for all is for the good of the people, then it needs to be mandatory that genetic counseling and testing be a requirement prior to the forced vaccinations,” added our concerned reader. “I am asking the senators to think this through before too many more genetically weakened children are harmed.”

“One remedy to override the MTHFR C677T defect is to take methylfolate and vitamin B12, and never take folic acid, a cheap synthetic form of folate which is found in most of the vitamin supplements on the market. … Those with the MTHFR C677T cannot break down folic acid and folic acid accumulates in the body and becomes toxic.”

For more information on this important issue, be sure to peruse the links below:

Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
More news on SB 277
SB 277 will unleash “medical civil war” in California as parents demand doctors be arrested for felony assault

SB 277 – California’s vaccine violence targets genetically vulnerable children who can’t eliminate the harmful toxins

California senate stacks committee to pass mandatory vaccination law – ‘It was RIGGED!’

Progressive lawmakers in California violate women’s rights with SB 277; children to be physically violated by government without parental consent

Vaccine class warfare: California’s mandatory vaccination law is an attack on the poor

California Senate passes mandatory vaccination law; tyrants move full-steam ahead to allow only neurotoxin-contaminated children in school

California Senator Pan has a “handler” – a lobbyist working for the vaccine industry

comments powered by Disqus Take Action: Support by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):
<a href = “”>California’s SB 277 is a form of medical genocide targeting genetically vulnerable children</a>

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Colloidal Silver

Advertise with NaturalNews…

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews…


Learn more:

CA SB277 Dirty Tricks Continue at State Capitol…What YOU CAN DO!

Keith & Lisa Johnson

CA SB277 Dirty Tricks Continue at State Capitol…What YOU CAN DO!

The dirty tricks continue at the state capitol.  A last minute committee member shuffle was made before  Wednesday’s vote. Senator Huff, who voted “no on SB277” was supplanted by Senator Sharon Runner who also voted no. Senator Bill Monning was added to the committee. He had already voted “yes on SB277” at the 6 – 2 Health Committee vote.

This follows the improper postponement of the vote, but that’s not all.

Now that the vote passed the initial stages in a 7-2 vote. The Sacramento Bee reports; “ The bill heads to the Senate Judiciary Committee, the next step in a potentially long odyssey winding through several committees and floor votes in both the Assembly and Senate. Every Democrat on the Judiciary Committee is either a co-sponsor of the bill or has voted for it.”

Unfortunately, to get SB 277 pushed out of the Senate Education Committee on a 7-2 vote, there was some obvious collusion on behalf of the bill writer, Pan and powerful lobbyists. Check out this brief video outlining the collusion from

Richard Pan on Facebook “Parents who won’t allow their children to be vaccinated are – let’s put it politely – misguided. That’s their problem – and their kids’. The Legislature should gather enough courage to make sure it’s not also everyone else’s problem.”

Couragesowers covered the delay of the April 15 Senate Education Committee hearing for SB277, which removes the personal belief and religious exemptions for parents that do not wish to vaccinate their children. Children that do not have the required inoculations will be denied access to public and private schools throughout the state of California.
As the committee chair, Carol Liu, offered Senator Pan an extra week due to the bill’s immenent demise, Pan was caught on camera receiving his orders from lobbyists Jodi Hicks and Janus Norman. The senator has former working ties to both.

According to an article from 2014 in the Sacramento Bee:
“As a UC Davis pediatrician, Pan was an active member of the group that lobbies for doctors in the Capitol, known as the California Medical Association. Jodi Hicks, was the association’s chief lobbyist. … and is a partner in a Sacramento lobbying firm called DiMare, Brown, Hicks & Kessler. She routinely seeks Pan’s votes as she lobbies for clients that include associations representing family physicians, eye doctors and podiatrists. Those three groups have together given more than $20,000 to Pan’s campaign.”
Hicks daughter, Seneca, appeared in Pan’s campaign commercials, Hicks said about her daughter Seneca appearing in Pan’s campaign commercials, “I don’t think anyone other than a few of us here in Sacramento know it’s a lobbyist’s daughter.”

Jodi Hicks (916) 341-0808 now works for DiMare, Brown, Hicks & Kessler, LLC (DBHK) and was named Capitol Weekly’s “Top 100”, an annual ranking of the most powerful players in California politics. It is my opinion that Ms. Hicks is near the top of a dubious, stinking pile of corruption.

During a recent visit to CMA, Governor Brown told the crowd, “I won’t enumerate all the issues because they are too controversial,” he said, “but I am glad that you are part of the debate. We need your help.”

A rare moment of honesty from Moonbeam.

Janus Norman
Senior Vice President
(916) 551-2871
Janus is in charge of the Center for Government Relations at the CMA, which pushes legislation through the capitol. According to the CMA website:

“The Center for Government Relations is the physician’s voice at the State Capitol. Center staff works with legislators to educate them on how legislation could enhance or threaten patients’ health or a physicians’ ability to practice medicine. Each year the Center monitors over 500 bills, and takes an active, public position on over 200 bills. The Center’s activities include reading and tracking bills and amendments, shaping bill language, meeting with legislators, testifying in committee, conducting research, and preparing policy papers and position letters.”
Ironically, as the CMA is lobbying for some of the biggest, nefarious pharmaceutical corporations, their ‘public’ motto is:
“CMA fiercely defends California’s bar on the corporate practice of medicine, which prevents corporate interests from unduly influencing physicians’ professional judgments in the name of profit and to the detriment of patients. Hospitals and other corporate interests do not have the same ethical and moral obligation to the patient as a physician does; therefore, it is essential to maintain the firewall between medical decisions and the corporate bottom line.”
Their ‘firewall’ is forcing legislation that will make mandatory products that have been known to damage children and have created profits in the hundreds of billions of dollars. Do you feel safer with fierce defenders such as the CMA? Me neither. However, there is action we can take.

The Solution

At this point, it is clear that the hearing vote was rigged by De Leon, Pan, and Liu in collusion with special interest lobbyists Jodi Hicks and Janus Norman. Everyone in CA needs to file an FPPC complaint! The Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) was created by the Political Reform Act of 1974 (Act), a ballot initiative passed by California voters in 1974

The complaint should be along the lines of;

California Senators  Richard Pan (District 6) and Ben Allen (District 26) consulted with special interest lobbyist Jodi Hicks of  DiMare, Brown, Hicks & Kessler, LLC and Janus Norman of California Medical Association throughout the April 15th Senate Education Hearing, passed out lobbyist materials from Jodi Hick to the committee members, and conferred with theses lobbyists to reach a decision about the SB 277 vote proceedings in violation of Chapter 6 of the Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 86205 c-d). During the hearing, Jodi Hicks also testified at the hearing without disclosing that she is a paid lobbyist for the California Academy of Family Physicians.”

Link to FPPC complaint website– please read all directions to have your complaint heard and responded to.

Link to the form to be filled out and mailed to the address on the form or you can submit via email

Straight from the FPPC website; “Within 14 days of receiving your sworn complaint, we will tell you how we intend to proceed. Be advised that unless the Chief of Enforcement deems otherwise, within three business days of receiving your sworn complaint we will send a copy of it to the person(s) you allege violated the law.


We can even take it one step further…

Let’s go to the offices to demand that they hear our complaint!
We need to go en-masse because we cannot know the number of complaints they receive via mail or email.

We need to show that we do not want this bill.
Enforcement Division
Fair Political Practices Commission
428 J Street, Suite 620
Sacramento, CA 95814

Over 500 Pakistani parents arrested for children’s failure to get polio vaccine

Sophia Saifi and Greg Botelho | CNN

Police have arrested more than 500 parents in and around the northwestern Pakistani city of Peshawar for not allowing their children to get the polio vaccine, an official said Tuesday.

Peshawar Deputy Commissioner Riaz Khan Mehsud told CNN that the 513 arrests took place Monday and Tuesday as part of a government campaign to administer polio vaccines in parts of Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province.

Those arrested will be released on bail if they sign an affidavit stating that they will let their children get vaccinated, according to the deputy commissioner.

Pakistan’s vaccination rate is inordinately low for a number of reasons, including attacks on medical workers, the displacement of people due to ongoing military operations and a lack of trust by some families.

Whatever the reason, the fact that a large number of children are not immunized is having an impact.

Such vaccines are credited with wiping out polio in most parts of the world. But Pakistan is an exception, according to the Global Polio Eradication Initiative, a public-private partnership that includes the World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). The South Asian nation leads all others in new polio cases in recent years, and has nine of this year’s 10 reported cases.

Read more

Must Watch Neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock Blows Lid Wide Open On Vaccines And Child Brain Developement





Toxins in vaccines infiltrate the brain


M. Randy


(NaturalNews) The blood brain barrier prevents dangerous substances and infections from entering the brain. If the barrier is compromised, the brain is susceptible to any toxin or bacteria circulating in the bloodstream. Toxic detergents contained within vaccines can destroy the blood brain barrier and then proceed to transport the poisons contained within vaccines directly into the brain.

At birth, the blood brain barrier is not fully formed. This barrier is not intact until at least six weeks of life, and many argue it may not actually be fully developed until much later. Any virus or bacteria to which an infant is exposed can go directly to the nervous system. This lack of a mature blood brain barrier is just one reason why vaccines given to infants are especially concerning. Seniors are also severely affected because aging is a factor which causes the barrier to become more permeable. Over-immunization also weakens the barrier. Children who follow the established vaccine schedule currently receive 49 doses of 14 vaccines before the age of six, and 69 doses of 16 vaccines by the age of 18. Hypertension, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, brain tumors, strokes, and head injuries also contribute to increased permeability.

While those with a compromised blood brain barrier might be the most susceptible to vaccine ingredients, detergents like Polysorbate-80, Triton X-100, Polysorbate 20, and sodium deoxycholate, can permeate even a well-established barrier. Polysorbate-80 is used in pharmacology to assist in the delivery of certain drugs across the blood brain barrier. The same is true for vaccines and with the help of Polysorbate-80, or another type of detergent, many other toxic vaccine ingredients including viruses, bacteria, and heavy metals, may pass through to permanently alter brain function.

Not only are these detergents destroying the blood brain barrier and allowing more toxins to enter the brain, they can also cause cancer and programmed cell death

Injected Polysorbate-80 has been shown to increase incidents of blood clots, stroke, heart attacks, heart failure, infertility, severe anaphylactoid reactions, and even death. Many of the Polysorbates are considered to be carcinogens. Female rats administered Polysorbate-80 suffered from reproductive organ damage.

The population is being inundated with a plethora of vaccines and is thereby suffering with leaky blood brain barriers. There are no studies on the safety of injecting these toxic detergents, and yet looking at the current vaccines on the market and the detergents contained within them (listed below), it becomes obvious just how deeply the blood brain barrier is being damaged.

DTaP (Infanrix) and (Tripedia) – Polysorbate 80

DTaP-IPV (Kinrix) – Polysorbate 80

Diphtheria/Tetanus/Pertussis/Hepatitis B/Polio
DTaP-Hep B-IPV (Pediarix) – Polysorbate 80

Diphtheria/Tetanus/Pertussis/Polio/Haemophilus Influenzae B
DTaP-IPV/HiB (Pentacel) – Polysorbate 80

Haemophilus Influenzae B
Hib (Pedvax) – “detergent”

Haemophilus Influenzae B/Hepatitis B
Hib/Hep B (Comvax) – “detergent”

Human Papillomavirus
HPV (Gardasil) – Polysorbate 80

Hepatitis A
Hep A (Havrix) -Polysorbate 20

Hepatitis A /Hepatitis B
Hep A Inactivated and Hep B (Twinrix) – Polysorbate 20

Agriflu – Polysorbate 80
Flublok – Polysorbate 20, Triton X-100
Flucelvax – Polysorbate 80
Fluzone – Triton X-100
Fluarix – Polysorbate 80, Triton X-100, sodium deoxycholate
FluLaval – sodium deoxycholate

Meningococcal (Menactra) and (Menomune) – “detergent”

Tdap (Boostrix) – Polysorbate 80

Pneumococcal (Prevnar 13) – Polysorbate 80

Rotateq – Polysorbate 80

Sources for this article include

About the author:
M. Randy is a freelance writer covering topics like vaccines, food freedom, and natural living for families. When not writing, Randy is raising her own family, running a healthy food buying club, and doing her part to educate other families on health, wellness, and food and health freedom.

Learn more:


Shocking Video: The Swine Flu Fraud Of 1976 Exposed By 60 Minutes


Nathan Laurenson

This Shocking video of 60 mins. reporting on the 1976 swine flu vaccine debacle that injured and killed over 4,000. The CDC left out on the consent form that it could cause neurological brain disorders such as Guillian Barre Syndrome which two thirds of people who filed lawsuits had. The CDC even ran adds with fake endorsements from celebrities to coerce and manipulate the public into getting vaccinated. This whole fake pandemic was created after 5 soldiers one which died had gotten the swine flu. Over 46 million people lined up and gladly got vaccinated for the greater good and no pandemic or mass threat existed. The CDC never even tested the vaccine that everyone was given. The initial vaccine was tested but switched to X53A vaccine and it went completely untested and the nation was used as a giant guinea pig operation that cost people their lives and left others with terrible crippling neurological disorders.