Real Time Web Analytics




What are Rev. Franklin Graham’s and Katy Perry’s views on Planned Parenthood?  Is Beyonce now pro-life? Was Margret Sanger racist? Does Planned Parenthood really provide prenatal care? This video brings some real answers to some real questions.





Battle Of New Orleans Radio welcomes UN Agenda 21 expert/author John Anthony and Georgia reporter Carl Swensson.  John exposes how the UN working through HUD is trampling on people’s personal property rights and communities zoning laws.  Carl updates citizen’s arrests of county officials in GA who have violated their oaths of office.  We also cover Hillary Clinton’s open lawlessness.  Are we living in  a banana republic?




I took a road trip this week from Georgia to West Virginia with a couple of local friends, one a long time independent journalist covering stories of fraud and injustice in our government. The other his companion, a phenomenal and tireless talent at supportive research. It was my second trip with them in a month to a state where I previously had never been before. I wasn’t sure why I was going, I just knew I was led to go and help support a man whom I didn’t know, but who seemed to stand for what I believe to be true and just. My awakening to this subject began a few years ago, and has rapidly increased over the past year or more. Now, I’m ready to do what I can, so with the opportunity I chose to show up.

Once there, I sat for two days in a Circuit Court courtroom and acquired an education in local civics. What I learned was almost shocking to me, even with the knowledge I already had of the widespread government fraud in our country, knowledge the average working class American is not yet aware of. In this case, a circuit court judge insisted upon trying a federal case. Accountable to no one, he did as he pleased.

Thomas David, House of Deegan made history almost single handedly during the third week of March, 2016 in that courtroom. Charged with the crime of being a terrorist of the state of West Virginia, his trial and prior hearings looked quite different for him than did the end of his trial over the three days leading up to the verdict. The arrogance and tendencies toward disdain that showed up from one person then another towards him within the courtroom finally surrendered, and melted into respect for a man of apparent honor and compassion for humanity by the end of the trial. The judge and officers in the courtroom could not help but find him to be a highly intelligent and humble young man of 39 years of age. Having viewed him originally more along the lines of a crazed lunatic out to take over a state capital, they became unable to lack respect for him.

Between two separate sessions of meticulously shredding the under-oath testimony of state witness Trooper Kevin Williams, one of a group of troopers Deegan planned to cross examine for his defense, Deegan discovered that the detained troopers would have to miss attendance of a wake and funeral for a fallen officer on that day. Deegan chose at that time to give up his remaining witnesses. During the next recess he asked Judge Reed to release the troopers from their duty to his trial so they could attend the funeral. They were released as requested.

Trooper Williams had clearly written out a complaint, under oath, made up of opinion, past experience with “other sovereign citizens like him”, and nothing based on fact. He could not verify any dates, details or even specify what detailed actions his complaint was based upon. You couldn’t have written a better script that this one. It was just priceless.

Thomas was poised, calm, extremely focused, and if he missed any details, no one could tell. He was respectful to all, never arrogant, never accusing of his accusers, but rather he calmly played his role in the statutory law playground he was required to play his part in. He took the case apart with his defense, educated the jury and anyone listening about how government was designed to serve the people rather than the other way around as it now functions. He expressed his concern for all children, and charged all adults with allowing the current state of government through our complacency. He defined the words that make up the heavily used phrase sovereign citizen, which Trooper Williams used in his complaint to label Thomas and connect him with others the trooper categorized him with. One, he said, means in authority, the other means under another’s authority. Together, it makes no sense.

During the prosecution, Mr. Deegan had been accused of making terroristic threats on one particular conference call played for the jury. It seemed to be an urgent and blunt call to action, yes. However, that call to action followed years of legal study on his part, and hours of filings with the state court by he and two other educated and much older men, all requesting their state return authority in America to its rightful place, with the people. These legal documents were all unanswered and ignored by the state, time after time. At that point Mr. Deegan stressed his expectations of severe effects due to particular current affairs scheduled to take place soon after the time of the conference call. Was he seriously concerned for the future, or testing the group on his call, which according to the prosecutor was admittedly filled with federal agents.

This particular two hour conference call was played in full for the court at the request of Mr. Deegan, as was a full interview with a Canadian radio host that was recorded after the conference call took place. These two recordings together painted an amazing picture for all who listened to them. They did portray a man making a call to action against the state government system, and they also educated their audience to why that call was going out.

(Editor’s note: The youtube video of full interview with Canadian radio host Robert J. Morris, used as part of the state’s evidence may be viewed below.)

A beautiful thing took place within the trial, something completely unexpected by Mr. Deegan’s accusers. I found it thrilling to watch, and was honored to have the privilege to watch this scene play out within the courtroom, as the eyes of some of the members of the jury began to open. Some appeared to be in disbelief at first, as they discovered that their rights have been stripped away through fraud that has been taking place in our government unbeknownst to them for generations. A few jurors appeared to experience some degree of horror, while others still seemed dazed and clueless of what they were hearing, until the accusing witness’s testimony began to disintegrate before them. Others never got past the words in the recording.

The jury was offered the evening off if they felt time would be required to reach a verdict. One round of votes brought them back into the courtroom to accept the judges offer to start fresh in the morning. Clearly some eyes were opened and could no longer see his efforts as terroristic, while others were committed to the breaking of codes and statutes. In the morning, and after an hour or so of awaiting the call to reconvene, the jury returned with a guilty verdict.

Mr. Deegan has already begun to prepare for his appeal, so know that this is not the end of this journey. It’s only one leg of it. Probably the toughest project ever to take on will be the federal system of fraud and statutory regulation law, fashioned virtually at the bench.

During the hearing Thomas had the opportunity to share before the court each of his constitutional rights that he felt had been violated. Afterwards, I heard the judge say to Mr. Deegan, “your supreme law of the land is not recognized in this courtroom. This is how we’ve always done things and this is how we’ll do it.” During the trial, I heard him say that “the court interprets the laws”. Apparently case by case. Yes, it’s actually come to this. We’ve allowed it. For the non-believer, the entire trial and hearings can be heard on recording, online.

Considering the mere handful of people at the hearings and trial, who of us is willing to show up at all, to stand with this mission that has the names of every child and future generation on it? There was less than ten people in that courtroom in support of Thomas. We’ll have to do way better than that with some sort of effort as Americans if we’re ever to make a dent in removing the chains of slavery we have allowed ourselves to become bound by with our complacency and deliberate ignorance of what’s so. Stand before any judge and tell him you didn’t know. He will tell you that ignorance is no excuse, and you will face the consequences anyway. This is no different. Think about that. Explain it to your young. This is a call to action. The best place to start is to educate yourself. Explore Congressional documents, read the statutes. A little at a time, and then be seen at the local level asking questions and learning. And speak up. After you turn off the television for a while. What you see and hear there is only a fraudulent veil that’s been created to dumb us down and to deceive us.






I attended the jury selection earlier this afternoon for Thomas David House of Deegan’s trial in Parkersburg, WV.  However there was some drama during a morning motions hearing as Carl Swensson, a reporter from Atlanta, GA was arrested for having a camera pen in his shirt pocket!  According to Heather Swensson, two individuals (suspected feds) wearing street clothing with guns were sitting directly behind her and Carl, when some communication began stirring among officers.  The camera pen was confiscated, passed around for examination, until the bailiff alerted purported Wood County Circuit Court Judge Jeff Reed.

Judge Reed ordered, “Place that man in custody.”

Heather raised the question outside of the Wood County Judicial Building as to how these officers knew Carl’s pen was a camera as he did not try to hide it during security scan earlier before entering the courtroom.   Somebody obviously said something.

So, Carl was arrested while keeping tongue in cheek, and taken to the magistrate building for processing.  Heather later told how as she was sitting in her parked vehicle in front of the Judicial Building, three witnesses of the state (one of whom being a state trooper) smirked at her while passing by.

Carl was arrested for being in contempt of court, as Judge Reed has been very adamant in previous hearings that absolutely no recording devices may be brought into the court room.  The only exception has been for local news station, WTAP.  This is a direct violation of the 1st article of the Bill of Rights, which acknowledges the freedom of the press.

Judge Reed later called for Carl to be brought back into the courtroom by saying, “Go get that man.”

So, Carl was escorted back into the courtroom, where Judge Reed lectured him, and released him from custody.  Carl was also not allowed to come back into the courtroom, so he had to leave.

The question of whether the trial should be moved to another court shall be decided by the jury.  As explained in the video above, Thomas has previously pointed out the constitutional fact (article 3, section 2) that any time a state is a party in a case against a citizen thereof, the trial shall be heard in the Supreme Court.  Judge Reed has previously explained this off by claiming it’s a “tradition” of the courts to hear such cases.

So basically, the fact that it’s a “tradition” of the courts to violate the Constitution, this somehow makes everything ok!

Opening statements will be given tomorrow morning during jury trial which is expected to last through Friday.  Thomas is being accused by pro se, WEST VIRGINIA INC. of threats of terrorism.

Thomas, along with Phil Hudok, and Gene Stalnaker is at the forefront of an effort to change the current corporate form of government to a constitutional form in West Virginia. Recently Phil was part of an in depth discussion about the rule of law on Battle of New Orleans Radio.  Please check it out in video below. And for more exhaustive information/documentation about this effort and Thomas’s trial, please visit





George Orwell’s 1984 Arrives



2/22/16 Breaking Information on Thomas David House of Deegan:

It is with a heavy heart that I relay the following:

Those few people who turned out for Thomas on Friday, the 19th, witnessed, Judge Reed say “I can do whatever I want” and certainly he’s done it. 

Friday was supposed to be a hearing for continuance of revocation of home confinement charge for Thomas’s thought crimes for which Thomas he has yet to be tried. However, to the surprise of the prosecutor and the defendant, after the continuance was granted to March 15, it turned out to be a hearing on evidence and motions.  No motions by Thomas were objected to by the prosecution, but all were dismissed by heir Judge Reed. Since when is it supposed to be Judge vs Defendant?

However, Judge Reed, has outdone himself.  This morning, the sheriff hand delivered a letter from Judge Reed to Thomas.  The Judge informed Thomas that he will appear on March 1 instead of March 15.  Heir Judge Jeffrey B. Reed also notified Thomas that he has been found guilty. Heir Reed “don’t need no stinking hearing!”  The judge knows that only a handful of people give a rat’s ass.

Suspended constitution, private-for-profit corporate government, is case closed.  I wouldn’t want to be in Reed’s shoes when judgement day comes.

Pray for Thomas as the criminal establishment has plans that he will never see freedom again and I’m not talking about the incarcerated crowd as probably a larger percentage of them are more lawful than the purported government prostitutes. 

“Lord Come Quickly.”

With no apologies,


Purported Judge Jeffrey B. Reed
Wood County Judicial Building
2 Government Square, Room 221
Parkersburg, WV 26101-5353
Fax: 304-424-1726



Judge Jeffrey Reed

Purported Senior Judge John D. Beane  ( Threat of terrorism charge was transferred from Beane to Reed)
Fax 304-424-1846

Parkersburg 2_19_16 840x.png

Few are paying attention to what is happening to Thomas David: House of Deegan as he is being railroaded into prison on a “Thought crime” charge. Whether you understand or agree with his (Thomas) findings or his methods, this will affect every last one of you as this will establish the precedence needed to further demolish “Free Speech” in this land. From Georgia to California, people came in support and were horrified to see just how lawless this administrator (Jeffrey B. Reed) for the Wood County, West Virginia Circuit Court was acting. This was put on the docket as a bond revocation hearing but Reed (“I rule as I see fit”) decided to make it a motions hearing. Neither Thomas nor the Prosecutor had any idea this was going to happen so neither were prepared.

Of course that only matters if you have a legitimate court system which we, most assuredly, do not. Welcome to your “New World order” folks, where the law is whatever these administrators say it is and where their rules trump everybody’s rights.

Disbarred Esquire Barry Soetoro is busy working to kill your second amendment while Jeffrey b. Reed takes his que from the DOJ to eliminate your first.

The precedence being set is right out of the movie “The minority report” where prosecution for thought crimes becomes the norm. Your new norm.

And still, no one gives a rat’s behind because it hasn’t affected them. More are sure to suffer the same fate until action is taken against these foreign agents (BAR card carrying Esquires) that have now taken over the courts and this thing you call government.

Article 1 section 9 clause 8 and article 1 section 10 clause 1 are as worthless as you let them be. Because you’ve allowed this infiltration we no longer have a Union of Sovereign States.

Good job!

carl alfred




Only a vegetable is unaware that the world is going into even more hellish times.
The corporate, big club machine that you’re not in, is having their way nearly unimpeded. We see the moral meltdown, chaos, and can only imagine what lies ahead.
Ruby Ridge, WACO, Oregon, and others are signposts. With crises actors and media manipulation and collusion, it is a monumental job finding truth.
Most folks realize the spiritual wickedness in high places.  The morals, the foundation that built this country are being destroyed. God will not be mocked and that is the key to this battle. Those who will only pray about it are so heavenly minded they are no Earthly good! God didn’t build the Ark. Many are called, few are chosen.
Thomas Deegan has been railroaded at every turn. True, he decided to fight a righteous battle with little hope of success. It has exposed the Beast Corporate Borg System in a profound way.
Their plan is to kill the messenger. Without a critical mass standing up, their plan will succeed. Thomas won’t be the only casualty! There will be more WACOs and Nights of the Long Knives!
Beginning tonight or tomorrow, and every day, up to Feb. 19th which is the day Judge Reed plans to send Thomas off to prison, I will be emailing, posting on my websites,,  and facebooks Phillip Hudok, and Mr. Obama Head, and on my YouTube Channel, Phillip Hudok information war darts.
I don’t know twitter, tweet, zello or the other social media tools, but I am sure some of you do. It is your reasonable duty to act.
 I am presently uploading entire 1/26/16 hearing in Parkersburg to youtube. I will post a link and also use excerpts to show the truth.
I am sure some of you would have been support in person and couldn’t. This is a means within your power and a call to action!
We can hang together or hang separately. We are promised a time when all will be revealed and only then will we know how what we did mattered.
For all the marbles and with no apologies,  Phil Hudok



Governments Usurped Into Corporations | Integrating Dark and Light ...

Governments Usurped Into Corporations | Integrating Dark and Light …



G. Carlin – “It’s a Big Club and you ain’t it.”
How did we get here (Corporate Government) from there (Constitutional Government)?  How did we fall from rights to privileges, laws to policy, men to fictions, masters to slaves? Three men, Thomas Deegan, Gene Stalnaker, and I, Phil Hudok were determined to know the truth. ( is our website with comprehensive documents and information)
Discovering that our own government has classified us as their enemies our entire lives, we were compelled act.  We petitioned our government for redress of grievances and breach of contract. Our government overlords would not answer which speaks volumes.  We filed a complaint with over a dozen writs of mandamus in the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals. The defendants addressed only one which is tacit admission of the others. The governor, attorney general, legislature, and eventually the justices placed themselves in default and dishonor.
Now, Thomas Deegan is arrested and jailed.  Take it personally!  You don’t have the Rule of Law and you are the enemy of your own government!  How did this happen?  This is the story.
We begin with some strong purposeful language from 143 year ago. West Virginia is nine years old and adopts the second and current constitution.
The Constitution of West Virginia, 1872:
Since through Divine Providence we enjoy the blessings of civil, political and religious liberty, we, the people of West Virginia, in and through the provisions of this Constitution, reaffirm our faith in and constant reliance upon God and seek diligently to promote, preserve and perpetuate good government in the State of West Virginia for the common welfare, freedom and security of ourselves and our posterity.
Article 1 Section 2, Internal Government and Police
The government of the United States is a government of enumerated powers, and all powers not delegated to it, nor inhibited to the states, are reserved to the States or to the people thereof.  Among the powers so reserved to the States is the
exclusive regulation of their own internal government and police, and it is the high and solemn duty of the several departments of government, created by this Constitution, to guard and protect the people of this State from all encroachments upon the rights so reserved.
Article 1 Section 3, Continuity of Constitutional Operation
The provisions of the Constitution of the United States, and of this State, are operative alike in a period of war as in time of peace, and any departure therefrom, or violation thereof, under the plea of necessity, or any other plea, is subversive of good government, and tends to anarchy and despotism.
Article 6 Section 47, Incorporation of Religious Denominations Prohibited  
No charter of incorporation shall be granted to any church or religious denomination.  Provisions may be made by general laws for securing the title to church property, and for the sale and transfer thereof, so that it hall be held, used, or transferred for the purposes of such church, or religious denomination.
What went wrong?  Most of our churches are incorporated and therefore government creations, under control of the IRS.  Political correctness is replacing God’s commandments.  The 1933 War Powers Act, did indeed make our constitutions, national and state, inoperative and made the people enemies of the government!  The high and solemn duty of the departments of government have failed us and continue to refuse to protect and guard the people of West Virginia from encroachments upon the exclusive rights so reserved. Our representatives no longer affirm faith and reliance upon God.  Instead they are creatures of private fictional corporate constructs, not government of, by, and for the people. “It’s a big club and you ain’t in it!”
It is very painful to learn that we have all been lied to from childhood.  However, only acceptance of the truth, followed by action, will set you free.  Thomas, Gene and I had our individual, rude awakening run-ins, with the corporate borg posing as “our” government.  It is not possible to completely plumb the depths of the rabbit hole, but I will give you the red pill of irrefutable signposts along the road to tyranny. Don’t head off unbridled.  The Divine Providence aspired to in 1872 is faith in God’s the righteousness.  Knowledge without discernment is deadly. We are in a spiritual battle.  Our land is in moral meltdown.  Being in total agreement with the Preamble, Thomas, Gene, and I, entered into the case file the entire Bible and cited specific applicable verses.
Gene, at 76, is the eldest of the three.  Gene’s awakening began in 1974-75 Kanawha County textbook battle which is documented in the book PROTESTER VOICES- A first time, first-hand protester account of the event that launched the fight for the heart and soul of America.  It garnered national attention.  Incidentally, the U.S. Dept. of Education had its beginnings shortly thereafter during the Carter Administration.  In 2008 Gene then became involved in a constitutional violation issue when he insisted that the State Treasury issue his tax refund in constitutionally mandated money. They would not/could not do that.
I am not too far behind Gene at 65.  I became active in politics and legal actions in the 1990’s with initial successes in the West Virginia Supreme Court in 1992 and 2000. I won in two important court actions involving the Randolph County Board of Education with whom I was employed as a physics teacher.  But in 1999, I and others began a battle over mandatory “face mapping” for a “driver’s license”.   After eight years of negotiations with the DMV and Governor Manchin, the Governor agreed to an accommodation.  That accommodation was rescinded by the succeeding Tomblin administration.  We have since discovered how the powers took the commercial operation of driver and applied it to travelers.  By slight of word, they redefined the word driver.  Around 2013 I became actively involved in the muzzling of churches via incorporation and I insisted the Attorney General honor his oath of office and enforce Article 6, Section 47, Incorporation of Religious Denominations Prohibited.  I produced two YouTube videos that the Constitution Party of West Virginia gave to many churches.  A 2013 personal battle ensued over state mandated compulsory vaccination of my daughter which I successfully tied up in court.
Thomas, is the babe at 39.  He has suffered most egregiously at the hands of a lawless government.  In 2010 when he was kidnapped and spent five months in solitary confinement.  It was kidnapping because he was forcefully taken without warrant (fourth listing down , on pages 11 to 13).  The state would have you believe is was strictly his use of marijuana which he had resorted to in a move of desperation having gone progressively downhill with a prescribed big pharma cocktail to treat the results of a serious automobile accident.  The side effects of the many drugs he was taking were probably enough to do him in.  Many are convinced that through a common enemy, Thomas and Gene were drawn together and through Gene, I got involved a couple of years later.  You may think enemy is too strong a term.  What else would call those who pretend to be your servants but act as masters using the heavy hand of government coercion, control, and outright tyranny against you?
There were two notable meetings prior to the beginning action of petitioning ten West Virginia Legislators on camera on February 24, 2015 that would be the first official action in our action in the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals.
July 23, 2014, Attorney General Patrick Morrisey held a “Town Hall Meeting” in Elkins West Virginia.    Mr. Morrisey was questioned on the church incorporation issue for which I had been assured two attorneys had been specifically assigned and DMV forced biometric identification. We received no satisfaction or subsequent response.
January 28, 2015 Gene, Pastor Butch, Pastor House, and I met with state attorney, Steve Travis, in the Capitol Law Library.  We discussed forced biometric identification, church incorporation, and facts and ramifications involving the 1933 War Powers Act.  Again there was no reply despite Mr. Travis’s multiple assurances that there would be.
On February 24, 2015 Gene, I, and a video cameraman when to the West Virginia Capitol in Charleston.  I personally served by hand ten legislators, a petition by Gene Stalnaker and me, Phillip Hudok, for redress of grievances and breach of promise document and an acceptance of their oath of office.  Most of these legislators were in key leadership positions.  We recorded handing them the documents and where possible the explanation of the purpose of the documents.  I explained that our constitution states that it is operative in both war time and in peace and that was violated by the 1933 War powers act. I also explained the purpose of our officially accepting their oath of office, thereby making it a contract between two parties.
There are links to the documents and YouTube video (See Filings & Responses – Petition for redress of grievances and breach of promise 2/24/15)
1. Using Legalese and Wordplay, otherwise known as Fraud, to work their way around the Intent and Factuality of We the Living Souls’ Sovereign Authority, Enabling Document and Contractual Terms to commit Fraudulent Financial and Terroristic Crimes against Ourselves and Our Fellow Brothers and Sisters.

2. Outright, Continuous and Flagrant Breaches of the Original Contract by our so called representatives who are violating their Duties, Obligations and Responsibilities as Public Servants and Public Trustees.

3. Aiding and Abetting of Foreign Agents by Our Public Servants and Public Trustees to allow International Money Changers, and their Agents, to Infiltrate, Destroy, Rape and Pillage, at will, under Threat of Unlawful Imprisonment and/or Death.

4. The Aided and Abetted Kidnapping of Our Children under various fraudulent and for profit commercial schemes.

5. The Aiding and Furthering of military tribunals to utilize foreign jurisdictions in Absolute Contempt and Breach of the Original Contract in collusion with foreign powers.

6. The Aiding and Furthering of the Unlawful Legislating from the bench of military judges and military jurisdiction in Absolute Defiance and Breach in furtherance of a Fraudulent Commercial Scheme.

7.  Placing Our jails and prisons under the control and authority of military tribunals, and the judges thereof, in furtherance of a fraudulent commercial scheme.

8.  Giving fictional entities endless authority and legal protection to rape and pillage Our Land, Environment and Fellow Brothers and Sisters.

9.  The Breaching of Contractual Oaths to support, uphold and defend that which permitted Certain and Expressed Authorities for the Securing and Protection of our Rights, Privileges, Freedoms, Immunities and Properties so Granted and Authored by God.

10.  Creating and blending of jurisdictions not expressly permitted by Our Original Contract to perpetrate Fraudulent and Violent Interactions.
11.  The Swearing and Affirming of False Oaths to attempt to legally evade the Public Servants’ and Public Trustees’ Contractual Duties, Obligations and Responsibilities. 12.  Unlawfully turning Our State over to, and under the authority of, a private, international body not contemplated, nor beholden, to Our Original Contract who are presently operating as the UNITED STATES and UNITED NATIONS. 13.  The legislating of so-called crimes not Expressly Permitted by Our Original Contract. 14.  Unlawful and Violent Intrusions into the Personal Affairs and Dealings of We the Living Souls’ Lives as we Pursue Our Lives, Liberties and Pursuit of Happiness as Authorized by Our Only authority, the Almighty Author of All.
1. The Immediate and Unconditional Public Affirmations, under Penalty of Breach of Contract, Perjury, Treason and Sedition, by Any and All Public Servants and Public Trustees, regardless of title, position and office, from the lowest to the highest, to Uphold, Support  and Defend the Original Contract Authorized by the Living Souls known as the Amended Constitution of West Virginia Ratified by We the Living Souls on the third day of May, in the Year of Our Lord one thousand eight hundred sixty two, and, in addition to the aforementioned, to Uphold, Support and Defend Our Unlimited and Inalienable Rights, Privileges, Freedoms, Immunities and Properties as Granted and Authored by the Almighty Author of All, without Exceptions and Conditions.

2.  The Immediate and Unconditional Public Severing, Voiding, Cancellation and Repudiation of Any and All ties and contractual obligations with, and to, the UNITED STATES and UNITED NATIONS, both of which are foreign and privately controlled corporations, and a Public Assertion of Absolute Compliance to the Constitution for the United States of America c1791.

3.  The Complete, Absolute and Unconditional Public Cancelling, Repealing and Rescinding of Any and All codes, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances, et cetera of the federal territory STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, State of West Virginia, West Virginia and its subdivisions, instrumentalities and creations, from the date of June 20, 1863 to the date of this Petition
We only received one email from a legislator stating that he was aware of the 1933 War Powers Act and he asked what we wanted him to do.  Our reply was to
bring up this fact on the House of Delegates Floor and sponsor a resolution to begin to remedy the situation.
Near the end of March, we served the same petition and acceptance of oath to the Governor via mail.  We served the State Attorney General and Supreme Court Justices through their representatives.
There was no reply from Governor Tomblin, AG Morrisey, or any of the Supreme Court Justices.  It is at this point that searching Dun & Bradstreet and Manta were producing unsettling but revealing connections which made our quest all the more important.
On May 22, 2015, Thomas David House of Deegan joined Gene and me in a 25 page Emergency Affirmed Declaratory Complaint, Ultra Vires In Law and Equitable Demand document filed in the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals. (See Filings & Responses- Filed Action in the Supreme Court of Appeals)
On June 5, 2015 The Supreme Court issued a Scheduling Order.  We were improperly addressed as pro se, and not as in propria persona sui juris.  Which meant that they wanted us pro se, or representing ourselves.  That would enter us into their fiction world of commerce not as the natural men that we are.  We are ourselves, we need not represent ourselves. (See Filings & Responses – Supreme Court Scheduling Order)
On June 12, 2015, we responded to the Scheduling Order with a Refused for Cause, Without Dishonor with ten statements consisting of one or more acceptances, denials, or declarations. (See Filings & Responses – Refusal of Scheduling Order for Cause)
On June 27, 2015, we filed a Notice of Default and Dishonor in Commerce, Admiralty, Equity, In Law, At Law and otherwise. The Defendants had failed by the own actions or lack thereof…  (See Filings & Responses – Notice of Default)
On June 29, 2015, we filed a Declaratory Judgment Demand.  Due to Default and Dishonor, we filed a Demand for Immediate and Unconditional Summary Judgment, Declaratory Judgment and Equitable Relief (See Filings & Responses – Declaratory Judgement Demand)
On July 2, 2015, we received a Response From Defendants. There were numerous inaccuracies and failings. Nearly all the Writs were ignored, and we were addressed again as both pro se and in all caps which indicates corporate fictions. (See Filings & Responses – Response from Defendants)
On July 8, 2015, we filed a Second and Final Notice of Default (See Filings & Responses – 2nd & Final Notice of Default)
On July 14, 2015, we filed a Proper Correction of Defendant’s Response.  This was to counter the defendant’s deficient, incomplete, and incorrect response.  We explained the definitions of kidnapping, and a definition and history of fictions among other things.  We cited postal regulation P030 9.13 and 10.1 which had been violated in their Certificate of Service mailed on July 2, but postage meter date stamped as mailed on July 1. (See Filings & Responses – Proper Correction of Defendant’s Response)
On July 23, 2015, we received a request from Daniel W. Greear, council for Steve Harrison, Clerk of the House of Delegates.  Mt. Greear, citing Rule 37, requested that we cease serving documents to his client at 105 Bradley Drive in Charleston.  However, both Dun & Bradstreet and Manta lists Steve Harrison as the Principal of the Virginia West Legislature.  And no, it is not the West Virginia, but the Virginia West Legislature with the W.Va. web address.
On July 28, 2015, we filed a refusal of Chief of Staff Greear’s Request for Cause.  Because his client, Steve Harrison, operates a business corporation from his home we will continue to serve him there.  We did make note that were he to dissolve the corporation registered to his home, and register it somewhere else, we would oblige.  Mr. Greear’s citing of Rule 37 was countered by Rule 2.  Under rule two, all rules can be suspended for expediency or any other good reason and since this was an emergency situation, we were invoking Rule 2.
On August 28, 2015, we sent James A. Hoyer, of the West Virginia Adjutant General’s Office and Mark S. Inch, US Army Provost Marshall General a notice and declaration and order to Effectuate Immediate and Unconditional Arrests and Removal of the three defendants being self-confessed criminals and outlaws.
On September 4, 2015, we filed an amended complaint which was read on camera outside the Clerk’s office. There were a number of additional entities
added as defendants including the Supreme Court Justices, the West Virginia State Bar, and others.
Interestingly, we found information that the State Bar is incorporated with the Supreme Court which is incorporated with the U.S. Supreme Court. It is a tangled mess of corporations.  We had subpoenaed a listing all public and private government corporations from the Secretary of State.  There was never a response to our subpoena.  At this point all state agencies were in default and dishonor and there was no higher court or authority.  All we were asking for was a return to the Rule of Law, government of, by, and for the people.  We now have corporate government and commercial law.  As you can see in our other documents on, we lost our country long ago.  Our bodies are now collateral for the nation’s debt.  We have been in a perpetual state of war since 1933 and the people are all classified as enemies.  We are governed by policy dictated by our servants turned masters.  The people fear the government and there is truly tyranny.  As Thomas can now attest, sitting in solitary, in the North Central Regional Jail, it is dangerous to be right when your government is wrong.
On September 5, 2015, Gene and Gene alone received the Supreme Court’s order of dismissal of Case 15-0491.  They cited consideration of the defendant’s joint summary response of July 2nd.
Never once was an order from the Supreme Court signed.  Go figure!  Who is going to tell the McDonald’s corporation how to run their corporation?   Public institutions can’t be corporations.  Corporate officers can’t be public servants.  Having county, state, and federal corporations is like having Obama in the White House.  Without having county, state, and federal corporations, we wouldn’t have Obama in the White House.  If you attend a church that is incorporated, what are you doing?
James 4:17 “Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.”  That is why I will not and cannot stop seeking truth and justice.  I am the Constitution Party of West Virginia’s candidate for governor in 2016.  I will use the opportunity to speak the truth as I understand it as often and as loudly as I can.  Upon election, the state’s attorney general will be instructed to begin a return to government of, by, and for the people!
What I have given you is only a snapshot.  The full picture involves international intrigue.  Will the people ever wake up?  Will the people ever understand that only a self-governing, moral people, can establish and maintain a righteous society?  Wasn’t it followers of the Bible given to them by their Creator that did establish the freest country ever?  Will the people ever give more than lip service to our most important founding document?
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.  That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.”

This article first appeared in Nov/Dec 2015 The American’s Bulletin.


Bill O’Reilly Completely Misses the Point About Free Speech…Again

Dr. Fred


What people are failing to realize is that Islam and those on the left have certain things in common. They both want freedom of speech to be limited. This effectively neutralizes the 1st Amendment, canceling out freedom of speech altogether. You cannot have “limited” freedom of speech. You either have freedom of speech or you do not.

The left has worked hard to place constraints on freedom of speech. The argument that you cannot yell “FIRE!” in a crowded place (unless of course, there IS one), because of what this will incite and the injuries and panic that would likely result is used now to state that anything that is offensive to Islam (or gays, or fill in the blank), should be curtailed. This is patently absurd because we all know that the people who would determine what is and what is not “allowed” as free speech is based on their particular likes and dislikes.

This is why the 1st Amendment stands as it is, recognizing that while we are not all going to agree with one another, people should be allowed to express themselves even if or when the result is that people become offended by that speech. That is the essence of the 1st Amendment.

But Bill O’Reilly – who rarely, if ever – admits that he’s wrong on anything, often goes out of his way to declare that we cannot put all Muslims in one category, for instance. He’s written several books about who killed Jesus, who killed JFK, etc., so that of course, makes him an authority.

It is ironic, but when I hear Bill O’Reilly speak and pontificate, I do not necessarily see him as a Christian, though undoubtedly, in many respects, he is a conservative. That comes into question though with discussions surrounding the current one regarding the 1st Amendment.

His latest argument has to do with a “what would Jesus do?” scenario, in which he invokes comments by Rev. Franklin Graham.

GRAHAM: As a Christian, I don’t like it when people mock my lord and savior Jesus Christ and what this event in Garland, Texas was doing was mocking the Muslims. I’m discouraged that people would do this…I agree that the folks in Garland, Texas was wrong.

O’Reilly believes that his anti-freedom of speech position is bolstered by Graham’s comments, and essentially says so.

O’REILLY: Rev. Graham reflects the Christian point of view that you don’t demean other people unnecessarily. Jesus would not have sponsored that event.

The problem is four-fold here. First, is Pamela Geller a Christian? I know she’s Jewish, but is she a Christian? I don’t recall that she has ever STATED that. If she is NOT a Christian, then what Jesus would or would not do doesn’t enter the picture for her at all. It’s really a strawman argument.

Second, Graham assumes that the event that Geller sponsored and held was for one purpose and one purpose only: to “mock” Muhammad. Were the images drawn expressly done to ridicule and mock Muhammad? According to modern-day Muslims, any drawing of Muhammad is punishable by death. This means that if – as an artist – I take the time to draw the most beautiful, uplifting portrait of Muhammad that I can, many Muslims would still be offended at it and call for my death.

muhammad drawingClick the link to see some examples of paintings and drawings done by Muslims and non-Muslims during the Middle Ages. As far as I know, no one was executed because of them, though Muslims will tell you – without equivocation – that no “real” Muslim would have ever done this.

An article – Modern Art from the Arab World By Wijdan Ali – confirms that depictions of Muhammad were fine until the 16th to 17th centuries when imams during that period decided it was no longer allowed to draw any form of Muhammad. In other words, it has NOT always been Islamic “law” that forbade drawings of Muhammad.

Third, why are we ignoring the situation of Charlie Hebdo now that Pamela Geller has sponsored a drawing contest?

Fourth, I live in AMERICA. I am guaranteed by the Constitution to be able to say what I want to say, to express myself as I want to express myself. If I want to draw an image of Muhammad, Muslims say I CANNOT because they will have to kill me if I do.

Bill O’Reilly’s argument that Jesus would not have sponsored the Garland, TX event is moot, if Pamela Geller is not a Christian. In fact, Christianity has no bearing on the subject at all at that point. The only issue at stake is the 1st Amendment and whether Bill O’Reilly, Franklin Graham, or anyone else thinks it was a “stupid” event or not is also not the issue.

The only issue at hand is whether or not Pamela Geller’s event was protected under the Constitution of the United States and the 1st Amendment. Was it? The answer is without equivocation, “YES!” Because her contest – and freedom to express herself – was and remains protected, there is no discussion.

The LEFT – and I include Bill O’Reilly in this since he is on the same side as they are arguing about the fact that people should self-censor so as not to offend – want nothing more than to LIMIT (read: DESTROY) the 1st Amendment.

O’Reilly should know better, but when it comes to Islam and Muslims, he’s generally on the side of the left. Because of that, he is willing to say that people should self-censor so as not to risk offending someone else’s religious ideals.

Tell you what, Mr. O’Reilly. When people stop using the Name “Jesus Christ” as an epithet, then maybe I’ll consider your point. In the meantime, I hear Jesus used as a swear word on a daily basis.

Moreover, the word “F*CK” is a very offensive word to me, yet that is commonly used today as a noun, an adjective, a verb, or whatever fits the need at the moment. I hear no one calling on people to stop using “Jesus Christ” as a swear word because it might offend Christians or to stop using the “F” word because of people’s sensibilities. Society has gotten so used to using and hearing these words that to state you are offended by them would likely result in a hearty “F*CK YOU! I’ll say what I want to say!”

There are two things the left is desperately trying to accomplish. First, to limit (destroy) the 1st Amendment and to limit (destroy) the 2nd Amendment. They will not stop until they accomplish both. Once these things are complete, America’s sovereignty is lost.

Was what Pamela Geller did in Garland, TX, “stupid”? At this point, I don’t even care and my opinion doesn’t matter. The ONLY thing that matters is whether or not what she did is fully supported by the United States Constitution.

Guess what, folks? It IS. End of discussion.





Public law 87-297, the Arms Control and Disarmament Act signed by President Kennedy in 1961, calls for a ban on civilian firearm ownership and the United Nations taking control of the U.S. military.

“It is the purpose of this Act to provide impetus toward this goal by creating a new agency of peace to deal with the problem of reduction and control of armaments looking toward ultimate world disarmament,” the law states.


Section 2 states: “This organization must have the capacity to provide the essential scientific, economic, political, military, psychological, and technological information upon which realistic arms control and disarmament policy must be based.”  One of the primary functions it must be able to carry out is, “The dissemination and coordination of public information concerning arms control and disarmament.”

This sounds like an infowar waged against the American mindset as then U.S. Attorney Eric Holder in 1995 announcing a public campaign to “really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way.

Section 3: “Arms” and Disarmaments” meaning, “the identification, verification, inspection, limitation, control, reduction, or elimination, of armed forces and armaments of all kinds under international agreement including the necessary steps taken under such an agreement to establish an effective sytem of inter-national control, or to create and strengthen international organizations for the maintenance of peace.” 

We are obviously talking about an all out hardcore global take over here. The director of this agency shall be appointed by the President and act as primary advisor to Secretary of State and the President in regards to arms disarmament matters and shall have supreme responsibility for overall functions of the agency having assistance from an entire organization of committees, advisors, deputy director, bureaus, divisions, offices, etc, whom shall have required meetings with the President, Secretary of State, and the Director of Arms and Disarmament Agency.

Now by The Arms Control and Disarmament Act, we are not just alluding to gun confiscations of individual citizens but entire disarmament of entire national military capabilities! According to Title III-Functions, section 31, the Act states,

The authority of the Director with respect to research, development,and other studies shall be limited to participation in the following in so far as they relate to arms control and disarmament:

(a) the detection, identification, inspection, monitoring, limitation, reduction, control, and elimination of armed forces and armaments, including thermonuclear, nuclear, missile, conventional, bacteriological, chemical, and radiological weapons;
(b) the techniques and systems of detecting, identifying, inspecting, and monitoring of tests of nuclear, thermonuclear, and other weapons;
(c) the analysis of national budgets, levels of industrial production, and economic indicators to determine the amounts spent by various countries for armaments;
(d) the control, reduction, and elimination of armed forces and armaments in space, in areas on and beneath the earth’s surface,and in underwater regions;
(e) the structure and operation of international control and other organizations useful for arms control and disarmament;
(f) the training of scientists, technicians, and other personnel for manning the control systems which may be created by international arms control and disarmament agreements……
(k) methods for the maintenance of peace and security during different stages of arms control and
(l) the scientific, economic, political, legal, social, psychological,military, and technological factors related to the prevention of war with a view to a better understanding of how the basic structure of a lasting peace may be established
Prevention of war huh? Good luck with that one! In the Patents section 31, the Act basically calls for complete and total transparency of all research within the U.S. “shall be provided for in such manner that all information as to uses,products, processes, patents, and other developments resulting from such research developed by Government expenditure will (with such exceptions and limitations, if any, as the Director may find to be necessary in the public interest) be available to the general public,…”  What a crock! We all know the pristine transparency reputation our federal government has earned right?! 
Policy Formation under section 33 seems to call for some Constitutional and affirmative Congressional legislative check and balance for powers made unto the President.  This is pretty laughable.
In the Negotiations and Related Functions section 34, the Act basically designates the Director as acting under the Secretary of State authority as U.S. representative to communicate with other nations and international organizations in matters relating to arms control and disarmament. Title IV-General Provisions, General Authority section 41 outlines the agency working with a number of other government agencies and compensation generalities.
CONTRACTS OR EXPENDITURES SEC. 43. states, “The President may, in advance, exempt actions of the Director from the provisions of law relating to contracts or expenditures of Government funds whenever he determines that such action is essential in the interest of United States arms control and disarmament and security policy.”  This sounds like government spending and corporate fascism gone wild.
Security Requirements, section 45 basically calls for background investigations into any persons, officers, employees, contractors acting with the agency to make sure loyalty to the World State (Brave New World) is not in question.  The Atomic Energy Commission must allow open door access of any restricted data to any said agent working for the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency for compliance control purposes.
Public Law 87-297 Arms Control and Disarmament Act is based on the Department of State Publication 7277 Dtd 1961

 Some primary points from this publication are as follows:
First, there must be immediate disarmament action….  Second, all disarmament obligations must be subject to effective international controls….Third, adequate peace-keeping machinery must be established….
The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world which has achieved general and complete disarmament under effective international control;and a world in which adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
In order to make possible the achievement of that goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives toward which nations should direct their efforts:
The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force.
The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order.
The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to insure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.
As states relinquish their arms, the United Nations must be progressively strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international security and the peaceful settlement of disputes;
There would be a 3 stage disarmament.  In the first stage the nuclear threat, strategic delivery vehicles, arms and armed forces would all be reduced. Peaceful use of outer space would be promoted. U.N. peace-keeping powers would be strengthened. An International Disarmament Organization would be established for effective verification of the disarmament program. States would be committed to other measures to reduce international tension and to protect against the chance of war by accident,miscalculation, or surprise attack. 
The second stage simply calls for further development of steps already outlined in stage one.
During the third stage of the program, the states of the world,building on the experience and confidence gained in successfully implementing the measures of the first two stages, would take final steps toward the goal of a world in which:
States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N. Peace Force.
The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.
The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes.
The peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.
In Stage III progressive controlled disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures of international law would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force and all international disputes would be settled according to the agreed principles of international conduct. 

Since public law 87-297 was enacted, just about every president has worked to enact its provisions, including President Obama who signed a U.N. arms trade treaty which was rejected by the Senate.

“The right to own, buy, sell, trade, or transfer all means of armed resistance, including handguns, is denied to civilians by [Article 2] of the Arms Trade Treaty,” wrote Joe Wolverton II of the New American. “Article 3 places the ‘ammunition/munitions fired, launched or delivered by the conventional arms covered under Article 2′ within the scope of the treaty’s prohibitions, as well.”

Arms Control and Disarmament Act

Arms Control and Disarmament Act








Soldier - Public Domain

If you are a Bible-believing Christian, there is no place for you in Barack Obama’s version of the U.S. military.  Christian service members all over the nation are being disciplined for reading their Bibles, talking about their faith publicly and encouraging others to live a moral lifestyle.  And just saying the name of “Jesus” at the wrong place or the wrong time while serving in the military is enough to spark a national controversy.  We live at a time when political correctness in America is wildly out of control, and thanks to Obama the U.S. military has become one of the most politically correct institutions in our society.  Things have gotten so bad that dozens of top officers that did not agree with Obama’s views have been forced out of the military in recent years.  The U.S. military is being transformed into an overtly anti-Christian institution, and for those of us that are Christians that is a very chilling development.

Perhaps you think that the title of this article is a bit of an exaggeration.

Perhaps you think that there is no way things could have gotten that bad.

Well, I grew up as a military kid.  In those days, the U.S. military was actually quite welcoming to Christians.  But now things have completely and totally changed.

For example, just the other day the Washington Times reported that large numbers of Christians are either leaving the military or never joining in the first place because of the “hostile work environment” that currently exists…

Christians are leaving the U.S. military or are discouraged from joining in the first place because of a “hostile work environment” that doesn’t let them express their beliefs openly, religious freedom advocates say.

Michael Berry, senior counsel at the Liberty Institute, a Texas-based legal organization dedicated to defending religious liberty in America, said recent high-profile cases of military chaplains facing punishment for private counseling sessions that reflected the teachings of their religion could cause devout Americans who are qualified for military service to think twice about joining the military.

Could this be what Barack Obama wants?

Could it be possible that he actually wants to discourage young Bible-believing Christians from serving our country?  Because according to the Times, that is exactly what is happening

“People of faith are going to stay away from the military,” said Mr. Berry in an interview with The Washington Times.

“I can’t tell you how many moms and dads I’ve spoken to who say, ‘My son or daughter wants to join the military, [but] in light of what you’ve described, I’m not sure I want to let them join the military anymore,’ and I don’t blame them. I would have serious reservations about my own kids joining,” Mr. Berry said.

If you are in the military today, you have got to be so careful about any expression of faith.

Even the slightest slip up can cause the authorities to crack down on you.

Just consider the following two examples which come from Newsmax

In December, a chaplain for a Ranger training battalion was sent an administrative letter of concern after a soldier complained that he had promoted Christianity and used a Bible during a mandatory suicide-prevention training session.

Last month, a Navy chaplain was removed from his job and may lose his career after complaints about his private counseling during which he discouraged homosexuality and sex outside of marriage.

You mean a Christian chaplain actually “used a Bible” and “promoted Christianity”?

In the old days, doing those things was the very essence of what being a chaplain was all about.

How in the world are you supposed to be a chaplain without “using the Bible”?

It doesn’t make any sense.

Like I said, the U.S. military is becoming an overtly anti-Christian institution, and it starts at the very top.

Since he has been in the White House, Barack Obama has consistently slammed Bible-believing Christians.  Obviously he considers them to be among his chief political enemies, and he barely tries to hide his animosity for them.  We saw another example of this just recently

Consider what Obama—who is on record saying “we are no longer a Christian nation,” and who never notes the Islamic identity of murderers or the Christian identity of their victims, and who ignored a recent UN session on Christian persecution—had to say about Christians at the Easter Prayer Breakfast:  “On Easter, I do reflect on the fact that as a Christian, I am supposed to love.  And I have to say that sometimes when I listen to less than loving expressions by Christians, I get concerned.”

One of the key people that the Obama administration has brought in to advise the Pentagon on matters of faith and the military is a man named Mikey Weinstein.

Weinstein is the head of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, and to say that he hates evangelical Christians is a huge understatement.  The following comes from one of my previous articles

The MRFF is a very insidious organization.  It is headed up by a man named Mikey Weinstein.  He has called Christians “human monsters” and “enemies of the United States Constitution“.  Weinstein is convinced that sharing the gospel of Jesus Christ while in the military is “sedition and treason” and should be punished as such.

With guys like that telling the Pentagon how to treat Christians, no wonder things have gotten so bad.

Obama is “fundamentally transforming” the military, and those that aren’t willing to go along are being forced out.

But don’t just take my word for it.

In a previous article, I included these amazing quotes from retired high ranking officers…

Retired Army Major General Paul Vallely: “The White House protects their own. That’s why they stalled on the investigation into fast and furious, Benghazi and Obamacare. He’s intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing us as a superpower, and anyone in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged.”

Retired Army Major General Patrick Brady: “There is no doubt he (Obama) is intent on emasculating the military and will fire anyone who disagrees with him.”

Retired Army Lt. General William G. “Jerry” Boykin: “Over the past three years, it is unprecedented for the number of four-star generals to be relieved of duty, and not necessarily relieved for cause.”

Retired Navy Captain Joseph John: “I believe there are more than 137 officers who have been forced out or given bad evaluation reports so they will never make Flag (officer), because of their failure to comply to certain views.”

Are you starting to get the picture?

In addition, specific evangelical Christian groups are often being singled out as “hate groups” during military training sessions around the country.  The following is from Fox News

Several dozen U.S. Army active duty and reserve troops were told last week that the American Family Association, a well-respected Christian ministry, should be classified as a domestic hate group because the group advocates for traditional family values.

The briefing was held at Camp Shelby in Mississippi and listed the AFA alongside domestic hate groups like the Ku Klux Klan, Neo-Nazis, the Black Panthers and the Nation of Islam.

Needless to say, the AFA is not a hate group.

But they are Bible-believing Christians that take their faith seriously.

For Obama and his minions, that is a very bad thing.

And as I pointed out the other day, we have seen this kind of thing since Obama has been in the White House over and over and over again.  Christians are being demonized as “right-wing extremists” and “potential terrorists”, and if this keeps up it won’t be too long until we see overt persecution by the government.

In the old days, Christians loved the military and the military loved Christians.

But now they are being set directly at odds with each other, and for those of us that are Bible-believing Christians that has a very ominous ring to it.

So what do you think about all of this?  Please feel free to share your opinion by posting a comment below…