Real Time Web Analytics


In this video, Luke Rudkowski goes over the latest Russia hysteria with Donald Trump which is induced by the left, deep state and main stream media. We go over how these assertions are wrong but also should be disappointing to any Donald Trump supporter since there a major break in his campaign promise. 



Mark Cuban and Mark Dice argue over Fake News, and wild accusations fly from the billionaire Dallas Mavericks owner, only to have him later retreat to his safe space after stepping up to YouTube’s most popular conservative news analyst.

NBC News released a “Dear Mr. President” video consisting of a bunch of clips of kids saying they’re scared of Trump and don’t like his plan to build the wall or fix our illegal immigration problem, in what they’re calling “Letters from the American Children Donald Trump.” Media analyst Mark Dice has the story below.


New “Dreamers” Pouring into The U. S. With Help Of The United Nations and Refugee Dream Center


Nathan Laurenson

Since 2014 we have been hearing reports of our government bringing in “Syrian refugees”. Even though its been widely reported that 5 out of 6 refugees are not even Syrian. This is the excuse that the media, the U. S. government and the UN were pushing was that we must take these people in our nation, because they were leaving war torn Syria. Might I add the reason Syria is a war torn nation is due to United States backing, funding and providing weaponry to the moderate Syrian Rebels. Not sure how moderate they actually are after the killings and the beheadings of Christians and moderate Muslims. The Syrian Rebels were trained by U.S. and allies in Jordan to be used as a proxy army to  fight President Bashir Al Assad’s forces. Now since then it has been heavily reported that the “Moderate Syrian Rebel” are Al Nusra, Daesh(Al Queada) and ISIS.

Then came the big lie. That the scary President Bashir Al Assad used chemical weapons on his own people, so we must take military action in Syria. Sounds familiar? Does everyone remember the Iraq war? Sadaam has chemical weapons we must invade to stop the slaughtering of civilians. So what do we do, we go in and  1 million civilians get murdered all in the the name of saving them. Makes sense right. Was chemical weapons ever found in Iraq? Nope. The globalist’s keep using the same old tired playbook. Foreign media outlets reported for the last 3 years that the evidence didn’t even support the narrative that Assad order the attacks, yet silence( crickets chirping) nothing from the complicit western whore media.



The point of me bringing this up is to set the stage on how we got to this point and to carve through the misinformation and disinformation presented to us by the criminal mainstream media. The Daily Resistance has confirmed from Battle of New Orleans Radio co host/reporter Goyim that he personally  witnessed Muslim “refugees” in the Louis Armstrong International Airport (New Orleans, La)  on his way to Europe and on his return layover flight at O’Hare International Airport. What he witnessed in O’Hare is quite disturbing and confirms the preferential treatment that  the alternative media has been reporting for 2 years now. Goyim who was walking through the airport terminal behind a band of “refugees” was asked by airport security if he had a “dream card” .  Goyim stated that no I’m already a U.S. citizen. Goyim heard security asking the refugee’s the same question if they also had dream cards. Then refugee’s were directed to a different terminal area than the normal domestic passenger’s according to Goyim. Two years ago The Daily Mail, Breitbart and many other publications reported that refugee’s/immigrants are allowed to travel throughout nation with no ID.

If you noticed the refugee’s are carrying white bags with a blue logo on the side. If you Blow up the image you’ll see its none other than the Refugeedreamcenter’s logo. The Refugee Dream Center is a post resettlement agency that offer’s a whole array of services like housing, food, employment, training etc. Separate dream centers have been set up nationwide to assist in the open refugee shipping process throughout the nation.


“The Refugee Dream Center is a post refugee resettlement agency. It offers customized services targeting the refugee community by ensuring continuation of services in their efforts towards self-sufficiency and integration. It is therefore established to create opportunities within the refugee community to facilitate their resettlement process and integration into their new lives in the United States. The Refugee Dream Center does referrals, social level assistance, and skills development such as healthcare education and cultural orientation, mental health support services, after-school programs, role modeling and mentoring for youth, adult English language and job skills development, and interpreting services. In addition, the Refugee Dream Center is a strong advocacy agency for the rights of refugees.”- Mission Statement of  the  Refugee Dream Center




The Refugee Dream Center was founded by fellow Muslim refugee Omar Bah. Mr. Bah is a former journalist, who migrated here after being tortured in a life of hell  in Gambia, West Africa.On the surface it sounds like a great organization helping people in need but its not fair for American’s to have people brought into the country and given all the monopoly game show prizes, while the American people struggle on a daily basis.

Mr. Bah also represents Rhode Island at the Refugee Congress of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugee’s. Who even knew that we have an organization like the Refugee Congress operating in our nation.  I’m pretty informed and I had no clue. Another interesting part of the Refugee Congress is how they are teamed up with a LGBTI Caucus to bring in LGBT refugee’s from around the world. This is another blatant example why its so important four us to pull out of the United Nations, tear up all of the UN treaties, then kick them out of our nation. A big question for me is how ethical or legal it is for Mr. Bah to represent Rhode Island at the UN Refugee congress, then at the same time run an organization that specializes in the handling of many facets of the refugee’s lives when they are brought here to America. It sure seems like he has the inside information to profit and grow his organization.

This may not be the classical false flag but it is a false flag in the since that elements inside/outside our government t have created the chaos in foreign nations, then bring in a giant destabilization force that will not assimilate to our values. We shouldn’t blame the people coming here because that is only symptom not the root of the problem. Until we address the root of the problem (globalism) we have lost and by blaming the migrants it then takes the blame off of the politicians and the corporate ruling elite.

This also proves that America is living under security theater state. When I fly I refuse to be bodied scanned and they ask me 50 questions and grope me, while they let un vetted people with no ID’s walk right in this is totally ridiculous. It proves what former NSA technical director has been saying for years that its all about receiving government contracts to rake in billions. Its never about our safety. Let’s take back our country from the global elite by exposing the truth. The American citizen’s are the dreamers , not some foreigner that will be used to destroy our birth rite.









The Use of Media in Conditioning the Masses



I have long believed that everything we witness in the political arena these days is nothing but the carefully contrived work of social scientists scheming to push us towards acceptance of a global governing system. Many Americans have painfully opened their eyes to the realization that the new boss is almost always the same as the old boss, and that politicians are little more than skilled orators that know how to play on the emotions of the electorate. By now, most of us are familiar with the idea that the two party system is little more than an illusion designed to keep us distracted just enough to believe that we can maybe—just maybe—make a difference the next time around. The only problem is, there never is any difference and, sadly, the more we allow ourselves to be fooled by this dialectical contrivance, the worse off our nation becomes. There has never been a better example of this than the fiasco we witnessed on Fox News called the Republican debates. While many people seem to think that Donald Trump did a great job and that Megan Kelly is now a horrible person for deliberately attacking him, the truth, in my opinion, is that this is all political theatre designed to keep our faith in a system that continues to rob us of our very souls. We as a nation have been collectively conditioned to view everything through the prism of entertainment media, and that is all these debates amount too anymore. It almost seems as if Americans have lost their ability to discern reality from television programming, and that we have reached that point where art is no longer mimicking life, but life is mimicking art.

The global elite are probably having a hay day watching our adoration for Donald Trump grow. To give an example of just how conditioned the masses are to follow, consider the fact that Donald Trump all but admitted that he donated money to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi, while proudly proclaiming he did so to get them to do what he wants them to do. This represents everything that is wrong with American politics today, and yet, because he displays just the right amount of patriotism, he is leading in the polls by a substantial lead. I’ll admit, it is refreshing to see someone call out the left on their hypocrisy, but in the end, is there a difference between “let’s make America great again” and “hope and change?” Not likely. It is just another carefully planned campaign designed to play on the emotions of a population that views this as just another “reality T.V.” program.

In my article entitled “Dialectical Materialism: Change through opposing views in media,” I discussed the fact that an education in journalism is little different than an education is Social Work. Everything in the liberal arts revolves around the concepts of social justice and social change and, in fact, it is admitted in the course description of many journalism programs that the goal of journalism is to “inspire the public into political action” and to develop awareness on issues concerning social justice. Consider, once again, the following description from Berkeley University.

“The goal of this online course is two-fold: 1) to teach students of journalism, public policy and social work how to use journalism and media as an implement of social change; and 2) have those students become effective change agents themselves. This class is not theoretical – students should be prepared to dig in deep and make meaningful contributions to policy change on both the state and federal level.”

As far as the Republican debate and the mockery that ensued, the moderators do not consider themselves “news reporters.” Rather, they consider themselves change agents working to advance the agenda of collectivism. There is little doubt that the questions asked by Megan Kelly were carefully thought out and scripted from the beginning. Another fact I pointed out in this article is that Fox News contributes far more money to Democrats than Republicans and, as a matter of fact, it turns out they are one of Hillary Clinton’s top ten contributors.

The entertainment media has a larger role to play than simply manipulating us into believing things that aren’t true. Americans watch a tremendous amount of television. Children, on the average, spend about 32 hours a week watching television, while adults, according to the New York Daily News, watch an average of five hours a day. This is about 35 hours a week or more. This is significant because there is substantial research that shows that watching television actually affects the way our brain works. This, in my opinion, may explain why Americans are so easily fooled. The Presidential debates, when handled by the right change agent moderators, are likely to resemble any reality television programming. You see, too much television actually increases chemicals in the brain that produce the same effects as opiates such as opium or heroin. Also, brain activity switches from the left to the right hemisphere of the brain. This may sound a bit ironic for those of us frustrated by the fact that leftists seem to act purely on emotion, but the fact is that the left side of the brain is the critical region responsible for cognitive processes while the right side is more responsible for emotional reactions. While watching television, the left side of the brain shuts down; this leads to the production of the opiates while the right side of the brain is processing the information coming from the television. This is according to the research done by Herbert Krugman. Consider the following findings-

Herbert Krugman’s research proved that watching television numbs the left brain and leaves the right brain to perform all cognitive duties. This has some harrowing implications for the effects of television on brain development and health. For one, the left hemisphere is the critical region for organizing, analyzing, and judging incoming data. The right brain treats incoming data uncritically, and it does not decode or divide information into its component parts.

Also, it has also been discovered that while watching television, the Neo-cortex, or upper region of the brain, also shuts down while the limbic system, (the lower portion) becomes more active. These lower regions of the brain cannot process information the way the Neo-cortex does, therefore, the ability to discern reality from television programming is diminished. In other words, the more T.V. you watch, the more likely you are too think that what you are watching represents reality. Consider the following from Krugman’s research.

When you’re watching television the higher brain regions (like the midbrain and the neo-cortex) are shut down, and most activity shifts to the lower brain regions (like the limbic system). The neurological processes that take place in these regions cannot accurately be called “cognitive.” The lower or reptile brain simply stands poised to react to the environment using deeply embedded “fight or flight” response programs. Moreover, these lower brain regions cannot distinguish reality from fabricated images (a job performed by the neo-cortex), so they react to television content as though it were real, releasing appropriate hormones and so on. Studies have proven that, in the long run, too much activity in the lower brain leads to atrophy in the higher brain regions.

Is it possible that Americans, because of their fascination with entertainment media, have become unable to discern reality from television programming? Is it possible that that the Republican debate and politics in general are carefully contrived drama designed to coincide with the conditioning of television programming in order to further distract the population? Given the current state of affairs, and the research presented, I would have to say that it’s more than possible.

Krugman, Herbert E. “Brain wave Measures of Media Involvement,” Journal of Advertising Research 11.1 (1971): 3-9. Krugman later became manager of public opinion research at General Electric.

To learn more about the psychopolitical agenda and communist indoctrination, check out my book Not on My Watch: Exposing the Marxist Agenda in Education.

Department Of Defense Manipulating American’s By Spending Money In Hollywood And The NFL





New York National Guard members rehearse with a large flag prior to an NFL football game between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Buffalo Bills, Sunday, Nov. 9, 2014, in Orchard Park, N.Y. The Bills will honor U.S. veterans through the league’s Salute to Service observance. 

AP Photo/Julio Cortez


This week the NFL revealed that it received 5.4 million dollars from the Department of Defense. A total of 14 teams were paid to promote branches of the military. Most people see this and ask why do we need to pay to promote the military. Everyone supports the military right. Its not about supporting the troops, its pure propaganda. The 5.4 million is really a drop in the bucket compared to the money spent by the DOD in Hollywood for  films and tv series. The pentagon actually has a film liason office which has been headed up by Phillip Strub since 1989. The whole purpose of the office is to propagandize the public and has been doing so since the 1920’s.

I’m all for showing patriotism and supporting the troops. Why are we spending  money on inserting messages into television shows and movies but  the troops will not get the benefits they deserve. For God’s sake the troops are put onto no treat lists by the VA. Some of the troops can’t even get proper body armor when deployed for war but we can pay the Atlanta Falcon’s football team to roll out an American flag and some poor returning veteran and his family. So next time when you’re watching the NFL and you see military this military that its not about supporting the troops. Its paid propaganda period. If the NFL really stood by the troops they would be putting out messages to stop using depleted uranium in the firing systems that are causing a whole plethora of health problems including cancer. Where is the NFL when 22 troops a day are committing suicide. You hear nothing. Its all bout getting people to unconsciously support whatever war the multi national corporations are pushing through the pentagon today.

In November 2001, Karl Rove met with the top Hollywood executive’s to ensure would be putting out a pro war on terrorism message, a pro patriot message. There is nothing wrong with being patriotic, I consider myself a patriot but at a time after 9/11 manipulating people and playing on their emotions is plain wrong. Patriotism should be real, should be natural not make believe. Through this propaganda we eventually invaded a country (Iraq) that had nothing to do with 9/11. On the guise that Sadaam had weapons of mass destruction that were never found. Let’s show real patriotism by standing by the troops so they get the medical care and benefits they deserve.

So remember next time you watch a movie, go to a ball game or see an add on television its not about the troops or patriotism. Its about a message to manipulate your emotions and feelings.



March Against Mainstream Media: How you can fight back

March Against Mainstream Media: How you can fight back

Know your enemy.

Cincinnati, Ohio (TFC)– The March Against the Mainstream Media took place in cities all over the United States this weekend to protest the sorry state of the us propaganda machine. In Cincinnati, the event consisted of a static protest near the college and a march around the strip of bars that sits outside every college campus. It’s Spring Break 2015 in Ohio and the alcohol was flowing.

Most of those that witnessed the demonstration had one thing to say:

“I know the media is lying to us.”

Six large corporations own 90% of the media outlets in the country. Access to independent media is at an all time low. With no competition, outlets are free to push the agendas of the advertisers and political handlers. It’s easy to say and know that the media is lying. It’s harder to give an example.

Let’s take the last hot-button topic: Indiana’s “Religious Freedom” law. Just so there is no confusion or claims of hidden bias, I was openly against the law. The law has been “corrected” and tempers have died down so rational discussion can now openly take place.

Conservative outlets painted it as either a defense of Christian values or a property rights issue to protect private business owners.

As I discussed at length in an article, discrimination is not and never has been a part of any Bible-based Christian doctrine. Christianity, if practiced in accordance with the Bible, is one of the most inclusive religions on the planet.

The media was actually able to convince people who style themselves as anarchists that gays were wrong for seeking special protection from the state by opposing the law. As is typical with propaganda, it’s a case of framing the issue in a way so that serious thought is required beyond the information provided for the viewer to realize they are being misled.

Who actually attempted to gain special status and protection from the state? Was it a homosexual lobby, or was it a Christian one?

The reality is that homosexuals were specifically targeted by a group seeking special protection from the state. The statute didn’t allow for a general right to refuse service. It only applied to those claiming religious grounds. If this was actually a fight over property rights or an attempt at establishing a freer market, it wouldn’t have been limited to those claiming religious grounds. It created a special class of people protected by the gun barrels of the government. Atheists didn’t have the right to refuse. Religious believers that wanted to refuse on grounds not based in doctrine were also unable to refuse service.  The media was actually able to convince anarchists to support a new law that provided state protection to a special class of people. Generally speaking an anarchist should never support the creation of a new law, much less one that creates a special class of people. That’s how powerful the media is.

When this was pointed out, viewers responded by saying:

“It’s a good start.”

There are no training wheels for liberty. Much like a pregnancy, it either exists or it doesn’t. There never would have been a follow up law to provide atheists the right to refuse service to those that don’t share their beliefs. Anarchists and Libertarians jumped on the conservative band wagon because the issue was presented as a “free market” issue.

The real problem with the law was that it lacked definitions and that the law was so vague that it would have had to have been interpreted by judges. Those judges would have to make rulings on what exactly was acceptable doctrine. In essence, the media was able to trick those who believe in freedom the most into supporting a law that would have been used to give the government control over what is an acceptable religious and what is not.

So what is the solution to media propaganda?

Like most things, the solution to media propaganda is decentralization. The media has Americans believing there are “two sides to every story.” In issues of national and international importance, there are always many more sides than just pro and con. The media frames the issues this way to keep it simple for dumb viewers and to polarize Americans so they can easily be manipulated by the political parties.

If you were to ask 30 of your friends where they wanted to eat dinner, you would likely get dozens of answers. However the media has Americans believing that in issues that change the way of life for 300,000,000 people there are only two options.

Easy things you can do to combat media manipulation:

Stop looking for objectivity. It does not exist. Reading an article with hidden biases is far more dangerous than reading openly-opinionated adversarial journalism.

Look for context. If a subject comes up, such as the Indiana religious freedom law, and there is no explanation as to why the law came into being, there is a powerful special interest behind the move.

Look for independent outlets. Strengthening independent media weakens corporate dominance. Here’s a list of outlets supported by The Anti-Media and here’s a list supported by the Pontiac Tribune. (Yes, The Fifth Column is on both lists. That really isn’t too surprising though because I wrote one of them.)

Don’t take anything at face value. With any media outlets, including alternative outlets, continue to research beyond the story. The journalist may have missed something. With most alternative outlets, you can post additional informational and the outlet will give it due respect.

Become a force multiplier. Independent journalists lack the resources and staff that corporate talking heads have. You are our support staff. Your tips, leads, sources, and ideas make our jobs possible. We don’t have time to cover every story much less generate all of the leads on our own. We count on you more than you know.

Use social media. Sharing, retweeting, and liking obviously helps get a message out. Posting adversarial articles in the comments section of mainstream coverage is an amazingly effective tactic for breaking people out of the mainstream death grip.

Don’t get mad. Journalists aren’t perfect. Contrary to what we like to tell ourselves, journalists can be wrong. We might even have differing opinions than you. Good independent outlets allow their journalists to be independent without editorial interference. The outlet that angered you by insulting whatever closely held belief you have, will more than likely have another journalist defend it later. Differing opinions and debate are the only things that will help break the corporate media stranglehold on the population.

You know what the problem is. You know that your voice can help. The only question left is whether or not you are willing to take action.

March Against Mainstream Media Set for April 4th, 2015 in Cities Worldwide

Fast approaching is the third organized global day of action known as the March Against Mainstream Media #MAMSM scheduled for April 4th, 2015 in cities across the globe. MAMSM is poised again to raise awareness and unite resistance against mainstream corporate media on all levels, locally and abroad.

“MARCH AGAINST MAINSTREAM MEDIA is more than just a protest. It is an attack against the credibility of the mainstream media in an attempt to steer its viewers away from its lies and towards alternative media sources. There are too many important things happening today that go ignored or spun by the MSM and unnoticed by the mass public. April 4th, organized protest in the United States will be brought to the doorstep of all large mainstream media studio headquarters including: ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and FOX News. With enough support from truthseekers out at their local MSM studio locations on April 4th, we will force the hand of those media outlets and they will be pushed to make a decision.” -Andrew Pontbriand, The Activist Post

MAMSM is organized and supported by many activists, independent journalists, and alternative media groups and coalitions. Check out their facebook page at for event organizing and details.





So, just how long have central bankers controlled the U.S. mainstream press?

1915 – “In March 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests … got together 12 men
high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the
most influential newspapers in the U.S. and [a] sufficient number
of them to control generally the policy of the daily press of the
United Sates. These 12 men worked the problem out by selecting
179 newspapers, and then began, by an elimination process to
retain only those necessary for the purpose of controlling. They
found it was necessary to purchase control of 25 of the greatest
papers. The 25 papers were agreed upon; emissaries were sent to
purchase the policy, national and international of these papers;
an agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to
be paid by the month, an editor was furnished for each paper to
properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions
of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things
of national and international nature considered vital to the
interests of the purchasers…. This policy also included the
suppression of everything in opposition to the wishes of the
interests served.” Congressional Record, Volume 54, 9 February
1917, pp. 2947-2948. Congressman Oscar Callaway

Any questions?


Jon Rappoport

The “dependent victim” psyop

The psychological operation to destroy the individual

February 28, 2015

“American and British feminism has amazingly collapsed backward again into whining, narcissistic victimology… Too many of today’s young feminists seem to want hovering, paternalistic authority figures to protect and soothe them, an attitude I regard as servile, reactionary and glaringly bourgeois…” (Camille Paglia, the National Catholic Review, 2/25/15)

I could have titled this piece: “What government fears: the black entrepreneur.”

But the situation is much wider than that—-

Any person who comes out of an “officially designated victim-group” …and then succeeds in life on his own… and then goes one step further and refuses to identify his entire existence with his group… but instead stands as a unique individual… why, that person, at the very least, must be a criminal, if not a terrorist, right?

That’s the crux of the issue: never leave your group.

That’s how society, civilization, and culture are promoted these days.

“Groups have needs, agendas, and problems, and the solution will come from government.” That’s the all-embracing formula.

Who would invent and expand that formula? The beneficiary. Government.

The fake appearance is: victim groups are fighting for recognition and special status, and the government is pushing back—but that’s now a ruse. That’s a cover story. In fact, victim groups and government have the same goal: a relationship based on dependence. One side depends and the other side gives and protects.

The individual is out of the equation. He is portrayed as the greed-obsessed reason these victim groups exist and need help in the first place.

Banks, Wall Street, and mega-corporations are depicted as the end result of individualism, whereas the government is valiantly striving to solve this endemic problem.

In fact, government, banks, Wall Street, and mega-corporations are joined at the hip. They brush each others’ teeth first thing every morning.

Political correctness and the burgeoning movement to outlaw “offensive language” are merely tactics to: preserve groups’ separate identities; foment conflict between them; and ultimately foster their dependence on government authority.

The idea that the free and independent individual is a sociopath responsible for the existence of victims is absurd.

The truth is, you can’t get free individuals to depend on government. Only “besieged groups” can be relied on for that purpose.

In the State’s eyes, a perfect society would be composed of groups who have entirely forgotten the concept of the individual, as if it never existed.

Peter Collero, of the department of sociology, Western Oregon University, has written a book titled: The Myth of Individualism: How Social Forces Shape Our Lives:

“Most people today believe that an individual is a person with an independent and distinct identification. This, however, is a myth.”

When Callero writes “identification,” he isn’t talking about ID cards and Social Security numbers. He’s talking about an absence of any uniqueness from person to person. He’s asserting there is no significant distinction between any two people. There aren’t two individuals to begin with. They’re a group.

This downgrading of the individual human spirit is far from accidental. It’s launched as a sustained propaganda campaign, the ultimate purpose of which is top-down control over billions of people organized into groups.

“The cold truth is that the individualist creed of everybody for himself and the devil take the hindmost is principally responsible for the distress in which Western civilization finds itself — with investment racketeering at one end and labor racketeering at the other. Whatever merits the [individualist] creed may have had in the days of primitive agriculture and industry, it is not applicable in an age of technology, science, and rationalized economy. Once useful, it has become a danger to society.” (Charles Beard, 1931)

Beard, a celebrated historian, sees no difference between individual racketeering and the individual freely choosing and living his own life. In making this judgment, he becomes an intellectual/propaganda racketeer of the highest order.

“British empiricist philosophy is individualist. And it is of course clear that if the only criterion of true and false which a man accepts is that man’s, then he has no base for social agreement. The question of how man ought to behave is a social question, which always involves several people; and if he accepts no evidence and no judgment except his own, he has no tools with which to frame an answer.” (Jacob Bronowski, Science and Human Values, 1956).

Bronowski is quite sure that hearing other people’s evidence and then keeping one’s own counsel is wrong. One has to accept that evidence on its face. This is sheer idiocy. Individuals are capable of deciding, on their own, what social agreements to enter into.

Here’s what journalist Glenn Greenwald (who is gay) has written about the symbolic nature of the American Presidency. Though not making reference to the group vs. the individual, Greenwald’s remarks illustrate the degree to which victim-symbology has taken hold in the US:

“Hillary is banal, corrupted, drained of vibrancy and passion. I mean, she’s been around forever, the Clinton circle. She’s a fucking hawk and like a neocon, practically. She’s surrounded by all these sleazy money types who are just corrupting everything everywhere. But she’s going to be the first female president, and women in America are going to be completely invested in her candidacy. Opposition to her is going to be depicted as misogynistic, like opposition to Obama has been depicted as racist. It’s going to be this completely symbolic messaging that’s going to overshadow the fact that she’ll do nothing but continue everything in pursuit of her own power. They’ll probably have a gay person [as President] after Hillary who’s just going to do the same thing.”

Regardless of the fact that the State and its allies are real oppressors who contribute mightily to creating real victims, what I’m talking about here is something quite apart from that: growing numbers of people who voluntarily take on the victim-mantle and seek comfort in nests of self-promoting groups who exaggerate and distort their own claims to special status.

The State needs these people. The State wants these people. Increasingly, the State employs these people.

Edward Bernays, the father of modern public relations, wrote: “It is sometimes possible to change the attitudes of millions but impossible to change the attitude of one man.”

Bernays understood that the basis of successful propaganda is a mass audience, an audience composed of groups, not individuals.

Retired high-level propaganda operative, Ellis Medavoy (pseudonym), once told me, “There are two aspects of propaganda. There is everything you do to get people to think of themselves as group members. And then there are all the messages you send to those conditioned group members. You need both aspects.”

The Matrix Revealed

When a group assigns itself solid “victim-status,” it creates one basic rule: a member must not leave the group. Why? Because if he does, he’s claiming he is no longer a victim—and that assertion is a betrayal.

Nice and neat. A prison.

“I’m a free individual.”

“You’re crazy. There is no such thing. Now get back in the group where you belong.”

Down at the root, betrayal begins as self-betrayal. The individual gives up the ghost. From that point on, his politics don’t matter. He forgets what he could have been. He defines himself by race and religion and country and rank ideology and group. He finds words and feeling through which he can express his role in a stage play that decays him from the inside out.

Eventually, if lunatics have their way, every person on planet Earth will be designated a victim. That will be the group of groups.

It won’t matter why and how everyone supposedly turns out to be a victim. The reasons will be forgotten. People will “instinctively” sign on to the agenda.

And the management team running the world will put another check mark on their sheet of objectives:

“Earth is beginning to resemble one giant hospital/mental institution. Break out the champagne.”

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at or OutsideTheRealityMachine.

NYT Caught Creating Fake War Propaganda in Ukraine Just Like Iraq

Kurt Nimmo


Following two days of propaganda centered upon dubious photographs the junta in Kyiv and the war machine media in the United States insist proves the presence of Russian troops in Ukraine, The New York Times has issued a retraction. It is buried on page A9 of the newspaper.

Freelance photographer Maxim Dondyuk said photos were taken without permission from his Instagram account.

Freelance photographer Maxim Dondyuk said photos were taken without permission from his Instagram account.

The Times quotes Vyachislav Ponomaryov, the mayor of Slovyansk, who says the man shown in one of the photographs submitted to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe is a close friend. He declined to name the man. “He has a good background. He is one of my old friends. I have good friends in South Ossetia and in Grozny,” Ponomaryov said.

“We don’t have any direct contact with the special services of the Russian Federation,” he said. “Everyone you see here in the militia are my friends, my brothers, my allies in the battle with fascism. We have volunteers who came to us from Moldova, from Russia, from Belarus, from Kazakhstan, from the North Caucasus.”

The establishment media in the United States claims the photographs show Russian Federation troops. The State Department pawned the photos off as evidence despite the fact the authenticity of the photographs could not be independently verified. State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said on Monday the images prove Russian troops are in Ukraine. “So these are just further evidence of the connection between Russia and the armed militants,” she said.

The Times reports the photographs were lifted from the internet by the junta and passed off as evidence. Freelance photographer Maxim Dondyuk, who worked for a Russian newsmagazine, said he had taken the group photograph in Slovyansk and posted it on his Instagram account, according to the newspaper.

“It was taken in Slovyansk,” he told The New York Times. “Nobody asked my permission to use this photograph.”

On Thursday, the State Department was backtracking. Psaki admitted the photograph does not show Russian troops in Ukraine and said it appeared in a “draft version” of a briefing packet released by the State Department.