Real Time Web Analytics

CANDIDATE TRUMP: ‘I LOVE WIKILEAKS.’ PRESIDENT TRUMP: ‘ARREST ASSANGE!’

RON PAUL

THEDAILYRESISTANCE.COM

“I love Wikileaks,” candidate Donald Trump said on October 10th on the campaign trail. He praised the organization for reporting on the darker side of the Hillary Clinton campaign. It was information likely leaked by a whistleblower from within the Clinton campaign to Wikileaks.

Back then he praised Wikileaks for promoting transparency, but candidate Trump looks less like President Trump every day. The candidate praised whistleblowers and Wikileaks often on the campaign trail. In fact, candidate Trump loved Wikileaks so much he mentioned the organization more than 140 times in the final month of the campaign alone! Now, as President, it seems Trump wants Wikileaks founder Julian Assange sent to prison.

Last week CNN reported, citing anonymous “intelligence community” sources, that the Trump Administration’s Justice Department was seeking the arrest of Assange and had found a way to charge the Wikileaks founder for publishing classified information without charging other media outlets such as the New York Times and Washington Post for publishing the same information.

It might have been tempting to write off the CNN report as “fake news,” as is much of their reporting, but for the fact President Trump said in an interview on Friday that issuing an arrest warrant for Julian Assange would be, “OK with me.”

Trump’s condemnation of Wikileaks came just a day after his CIA Director, Michael Pompeo, attacked Wikileaks as a “hostile intelligence service.” Pompeo accused Assange of being “a fraud — a coward hiding behind a screen.”

Pompeo’s word choice was no accident. By accusing Wikileaks of being a “hostile intelligence service” rather than a publisher of information on illegal and abusive government practices leaked by whistleblowers, he signaled that the organization has no First Amendment rights. Like many in Washington, he does not understand that the First Amendment is a limitation on government rather than a granting of rights to citizens. Pompeo was declaring war on Wikileaks.

But not that long ago Pompeo also cited Wikileaks as an important source of information. In July he drew attention to the Wikileaks release of information damaging to the Clinton campaign, writing, “Need further proof that the fix was in from President Obama on down?”

There is a word for this sudden about-face on Wikileaks and the transparency it provides us into the operations of the prominent and powerful: hypocrisy.

The Trump Administration’s declaration of war on whistleblowers and Wikileaks is one of the greatest disappointments in these first 100 days. Donald Trump rode into the White House with promises that he would “drain the swamp,” meaning that he would overturn the apple carts of Washington’s vested interests. By unleashing those same vested interests on those who hold them in check – the whistleblowers and those who publish their revelations – he has turned his back on those who elected him.

Julian Assange, along with the whistleblowers who reveal to us the evil that is being done in our name, are heroes. They deserve our respect and admiration, not a prison cell. If we allow this president to declare war on those who tell the truth, we have only ourselves to blame.

This article first appeared at RonPaulInstitute.org.


 

LIVE: UPDATE ON OBAMACARE DEATH SPIRAL

INFOWARS

Paul Ryan’s efforts to repeal and replace Obamacare foiled

Infowars breaks down the open revolt against the Obamacare repeal and replace bill.

LIVE: THE TRUTH ABOUT THE LONDON ATTACK

INFOWARS

What they’re not telling you…

Infowars breaks down the latest on the London terror attack which occurred near the UK parliament and left four people dead. 

LIVE COVERAGE – LONDON TERROR ATTACK

THEDAILYRESISTANCE.COM

Live streaming coverage of London Terror Attack via Sky News Live.

WHY TRUMP’S SYRIA ‘SURGE’ WILL FAIL

RON PAUL

THEDAILYRESISTANCE.COM

Last week President Trump significantly escalated the US military presence in Syria, sending some 400 Marines to the ISIS-controlled Raqqa, and several dozen Army Rangers to the contested area around Manbij. According to press reports he will also station some 2,500 more US troops in Kuwait to be used as he wishes in Iraq and Syria.

Not only is it illegal under international law to send troops into another country without permission, it is also against US law for President Trump to take the country to war without a declaration. But not only is Trump’s first big war illegal: it is doomed to failure because it makes no sense.

President Trump says the purpose of the escalation is to defeat ISIS in Raqqa, its headquarters in Syria. However the Syrian Army with its allies Russia and Iran are already close to defeating ISIS in Syria. Why must the US military be sent in when the Syrian army is already winning? Does Trump wish to occupy eastern Syria and put a Washington-backed rebel government in charge? Has anyone told President Trump what that would to cost in dollars and lives – including American lives? How would this US-backed rebel government respond to the approach of a Syrian army backed up by the Russian military?

Is Trump planning on handing eastern Syria over to the Kurds, who have been doing much of the fighting in the area? How does he think NATO-ally Turkey would take a de facto Kurdistan carved out of Syria with its eyes on Kurdish-inhabited southern Turkey?

And besides, by what rights would Washington carve up Syria or any other country?

Or is Trump going to give up on the US policy of “regime change” and hand conquered eastern Syria back to Assad? If that is the case, why waste American lives and money if the Syrians and their allies are already doing the job? Candidate Trump even said he was perfectly happy with Russia and Syria getting rid of ISIS. If US policy is shifting toward accepting an Assad victory, it could be achieved by ending arms supplies to the rebels and getting out of the way.

It does not appear that President Trump or his advisors have thought through what happens next if the US military takes possession of Raqqa, Syria. What is the endgame? Maybe the neocons told him it would be a “cakewalk” as they promised before the 2003 Iraq invasion.

Part of the problem is that President Trump’s advisors believe the myth that the US “surge” in Iraq and Afghanistan was a great success and repeating it would being the victory that eluded Obama with his reliance of drones and proxy military forces. A big show of US military force on the ground – like the 100,000 sent to Afghanistan by Obama in 2009 – is what is needed in Syria, these experts argue. Rarely is it asked that if the surge worked so well why are Afghanistan and Iraq still a disaster?

President Trump’s escalation in Syria is doomed to failure. He is being drawn into a quagmire by the neocons that will destroy scores of lives, cost us a fortune, and may well ruin his presidency. He must de-escalate immediately before it is too late.
This article first appeared at RonPaulInstitute.org.


Marines And Army Rangers Land In Syria To Speed Up ISIS Fight

Marines And Army Rangers Land In Syria To Speed Up ISIS Fight

Copyright © 2017 by RonPaul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.

ARIZONA CHALLENGES THE FED’S MONEY MONOPOLY

Image Credit: activistpost.com

Image Credit: activistpost.com

RON PAUL

THEDAILYRESISTANCE.COM

History shows that, if individuals have the freedom to choose what to use as money, they will likely opt for gold or silver.

Of course, modern politicians and their Keynesian enablers despise the gold or silver standard. This is because linking a currency to a precious metal limits the ability of central banks to finance the growth of the welfare-warfare state via the inflation tax. This forces politicians to finance big government much more with direct means of taxation.

Despite the hostility toward gold from modern politicians, gold played a role in US monetary policy for sixty years after the creation of the Federal Reserve. Then, in 1971, as concerns over the US government’s increasing deficits led many foreign governments to convert their holdings of US dollars to gold, President Nixon closed the gold window, creating America’s first purely fiat currency.

America’s 46-year experiment in fiat currency has gone exactly as followers of the Austrian school predicted: a continuing decline in the dollar’s purchasing power accompanied by a decline in the standard of living of middle- and working-class Americans, a series of Federal Reserve-created booms followed by increasingly severe busts, and an explosive growth in government spending. Federal Reserve policies are also behind much of the increase in income inequality.

Since the 2008 Fed-created economic meltdown, more Americans have become aware of the Federal Reserve’s responsibility for America’s economic problems. This growing anti-Fed sentiment is one of the key factors behind the liberty movement’s growth and represents the most serious challenge to the Fed’s legitimacy in its history. This movement has made “Audit the Fed” into a major national issue that is now closer than ever to being signed into law.

Audit the Fed is not the only focus of the growing anti-Fed movement. For example, this Wednesday the Arizona Senate Finance and Rules Committees will consider legislation (HB 2014) officially defining gold, silver, and other precious metals as legal tender. The bill also exempts transactions in precious metals from state capital gains taxes, thus ensuring that people are not punished by the taxman for rejecting Federal Reserve notes in favor of gold or silver. Since inflation increases the value of precious metals, these taxes give the government one more way to profit from the Federal Reserve’s currency debasement.

HB 2014 is a very important and timely piece of legislation. The Federal Reserve’s failure to reignite the economy with record-low interest rates since the last crash is a sign that we may soon see the dollar’s collapse. It is therefore imperative that the law protect people’s right to use alternatives to what may soon be virtually worthless Federal Reserve notes.

Passage of HB 2014 would also send a message to Congress and the Trump administration that the anti-Fed movement is growing in influence. Thus, passage of this bill will not just strengthen movements in other states to pass similar legislation; it will also help build support for the Audit the Fed bill and legislation repealing federal legal tender laws.

This Wednesday I will be in Arizona to help rally support for HB 2014, speaking on behalf of the bill before the Arizona Senate Finance Committee at 9:00 a.m. I will also be speaking at a rally at noon at the Arizona state capitol. I hope every supporter of sound money in the Phoenix area joins me to show their support for ending the Fed’s money monopoly.

This article first appeared at RonPaulInstitute.org.


Copyright © 2017 by RonPaul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.

US ATTORNEY GENERAL FINALLY ADMITS WEED ISN’T A GATEWAY DRUG – PRESCRIPTION DRUGS ARE

 US Attorney General Finally Admits Weed Isn’t a Gateway Drug — Prescription Pills Are

US Attorney General Finally Admits Weed Isn’t a Gateway Drug — Prescription Pills Are

September 28, 2016   |   Alice Salles

(ANTIMEDIA) The National Institute on Drug Abuse is a U.S. federal research institute focused on[advancing] science on the causes and consequences of drug use and addiction … to apply that knowledge to improve individual and public health. ” Though it admits “the majority of people who use marijuana do not go on to use other, ‘harder’ substances,” it still describes marijuana as a gateway drug.

But U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch recently told a group of Kentucky high school students the role of marijuana in the national drug abuse debate has been overstated.

While discussing how heroin abuse and how individuals often develop an addiction, Lynch argued:

[I]ndividuals [start out] with a prescription drug problem, and then because they need more and more, they turn to heroin. It isn’t so much that marijuana is the step right before using prescription drugs or opioids —  it is true that if you tend to experiment with a lot of things in life, you may be inclined to experiment with drugs, as well. But it’s not like we’re seeing that marijuana as a specific gateway.”

Attorney General Lynch added that instead of trafficking rings, what “introduce[s] a person to opioids … [is] the household medicine cabinet.”

The event she attended was part of the Prescription Opioid Heroin Epidemic Awareness Week, a campaign designed by the White House that includes “250 different events highlighting the importance of prevention, enforcement, and treatment.” As expected, the campaign focused on advertising the official approach to drug abuse, encouraging the public to support the Obama administration’s approach to the opioid crisis.

Measures embraced by the administration includeexpanding evidence-based prevention and treatment programs, increasing access to the overdose-reversal medicine naloxone, and supporting targeted enforcement activities.” But nowhere in the official campaign page is there a list of practical solutions to the opioid crisis, an admission of guilt, or a concession stating that, despite marijuana’s official federal classification, cannabis is not seen as the root of the problem by the very head of the United States Department of Justice.

In early August, the Obama administration said no to a bid urging the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to reconsider how marijuana is classified under federal drug control laws. Currently, the DEA lists marijuana as a Schedule I drug, along with heroin, the pivot drug of the opioid epidemic. But as the Attorney General’s comments demonstrate, the federal government fails to take its own classification methodology seriously, choosing instead to contend that prescription drug abuse is a much bigger issue. Per its federal classification, marijuana should be seen as a threat as dangerous as heroin, and yet Lynch appears to contend the abuse of legal drugs is keeping federal agents busy — not the enforcement of her agency’s own rules.

What Lynch is failing to discuss on the federal government’s anti-opioid abuse campaign trail is the racist, opportunistic roots of the failed and decades-long drug war in America. But as American states begin to shift their approach to some of the targets of this nationwide anti-drug campaign, legalized marijuana is able to accomplish what many drug war apologists claimed criminalization would achieve: bringing down the drug cartels.

But as the Washington Post report demonstrates, legalizing pot is not enough.

While powerful drug cartels have seen legalized marijuana taking a chunk out of their profits, the criminalization of other drugs such as heroin continues to put addicts in harm’s way.

With drug cartels seeing an increase in demand due to the pressure mounting from the growth of the relationship between the government and the pharmaceutical industry, dangerous alternatives to heroin, such as fentanyl, are sold on the street as regular heroin.

Without legal means to produce the drugs the market demands, these cartels are not concerned with the quality of their product nor the health of their consumer. When looking at the destruction stemming from the illegal drug trafficking industry, we are able to trace it back to the criminalization of drug commerce and use — and yet government officials prefer to live in the dark ages, upping their involvement with the war on yet another drug epidemic entirely manufactured by crony kingpins.


This article (US Attorney General Finally Admits Weed Isn’t a Gateway Drug — Prescription Pills Are) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Alice Salles and theAntiMedia.org. Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11 pm Eastern/8 pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, please email the error and name of the article to edits@theantimedia.org.

 

THOMAS DAVID HOUSE OF DEEGAN AUDIO FILES OF PURPORTED TRIAL MARCH 15 TO MARCH 18

Left Click To Listen – Right Click To Download

March 15, 2016
—————————————————————-
March 16, 2016
—————————————————————–
March 17, 2016
—————————————————————-
March 18, 2016

SOUND MONEY AND FISCAL POLICY

IMAGE CREDITS: flickr, 9731367@N02

IMAGE CREDITS: flickr, 9731367@N02

PAUL-MARTIN FOSS

MISES.ORG

The week before last marked my first time attending the Austrian Economics Research Conference, an annual meeting of economists of the Austrian school hosted by the Ludwig von Mises Institute in Auburn, AL. While many of the presentations were interesting, one that I found particularly helpful was that by Patrick Barron of the University of Iowa. What was especially useful was how he tied together monetary and fiscal policy. The connection between the two might seem self-evident to many Austrians, but it wouldn’t seem self-evident to the man on the street. Yet by tying the two together it should be possible to bring more people to support sound money.

Wasteful government spending is something that is apparent to millions of Americans. It makes them angry to see their tax dollars misspent and wasted on costly boondoggles. It is relatively easy, therefore, to get people to support efforts to cut government spending. Yet no matter how much effort is expended in the effort to rein in government spending, it continues to grow out of control. What if you could do one thing that would do more than anything to cut government spending? Imagine how much support you could get for that. That is where Prof. Barron comes in.

Sound money, to Dr. Barron, is the most important check on government spending. If money is sound, meaning that the government cannot inflate the money supply at will, then government spending will be limited. Remember that governments can fund their operations through three methods: 1.) Taxation; 2.) Bonds, or borrowing; 3.) Inflation.

Taxation is self-limiting because at higher tax rates there will be massive tax avoidance and tax revenues will fall, or the government might be voted out or overthrown if people are angry enough. Bonds have to be repaid, which comes from future taxation, so we are back to the self-limiting aspect of tax funding. Bonds also require interest payments, and if a government isn’t creditworthy then the interest payments may make borrowing money prohibitively expensive.

This leads us to the third and preferred method, inflation. By creating more money, the government decreases the value of each monetary unit. But it normally does so in a slow enough manner as to be barely perceptible to the average person. And where does this newly-created money go? Why, to the government’s coffers, of course. There it gets spent on wars, welfare, and other boondoggles. In the meantime, the newly-created money causes the prices of goods to increase, driving up the cost of living for the average person. In this way, inflation is a stealth tax. Its effects are just as insidious as direct taxation in that it takes money from citizens and deposits it into government coffers, but it does so in such an imperceptible way that very few people realize that they are being fleeced. That allows governments to spend far more money than they otherwise would be able to by relying on taxes and borrowing alone, which is why governments prefer it.

But in order for inflation to work effectively as a government policy, governments have to exercise control over the monetary system. They have to have the ability to debase money, devaluing each unit of currency. If people can use money that is outside the government’s control then the government’s schemes are thwarted. That is why governments throughout history have tried to monopolize the issuance of money. Reining in government spending will require breaking up that monopoly, eliminating the government’s control over the monetary system, and ensuring that people have sound money and alternative currencies to use when the government tries to use inflation as a policy tool. Inflation and increased government spending are two sides of the same coin. If people are really serious about reining in government spending, they need to jump on the sound money bandwagon.

Note: The views expressed on Mises.org are not necessarily those of the Mises Institute.

 

 

MEET THE REAL PERSON: A SHORT BIOGRAPHY OF DR. DAVID DUKE

Dr. David Duke receiving his doctorate in history

Dr. David Duke receiving his doctorate in history

PROF. R. A. JOHNSON

DAVIDDUKE.COM

Dr. David Duke receiving his Doctorate in History

Photo gallery below

Dr. David Duke has a PhD in History, is a former member of the House of Representatives from Louisiana.

He stands up for the right of every people on earth to preserve its heritage, culture and freedom. He stands bravely and honestly for true Human Diversity, Independence and Freedom!

Dr. Duke views Zionist-driven Globalism and its collaborators the greatest enemies of mankind.

He asserts that a matrix of international criminal banks, news and entertainment media, as well as Zionist political corruption drives the world toward war, toward economic exploitation and to destruction of fundamental human rights, health, freedom, human values and independence.

He has become one of the most well known Americans in the world who opposed the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

He was one of the few political personalities who before the Iraq said that the “weapons of mass destruction” allegations against Iraq were lies and that the war would ultimately have a catastrophic effect not just on the Iraqi people, but upon the American people as well.

He foretold not a “cakewalk” but a long drawn out war with hundreds of thousands of harmed young Americans and a enormous cost of American money.

He is proven right about both the weapons of mass destruction lie, and the fact that far from bringing freedom to the Iraqi people, the Iraq War led to hundreds of thousands of dead Iraqi men, women and children; and perpetual civil war causing human suffering that far eclipses even the most exaggerated evils of Saddam Hussein. Dr. Duke has been an unsung prophet on this and many areas of political and social life the world over.

His books Jewish Supremacism and My Awakening are translated in more than a dozen and one-half languages and Jewish Supremacism is the most-read known anti-Zionist book in the world. Millions of copies of his books are now in circulation around the world and have even been available in the the Russian Duma  (Parliament). His videos now number over 5 million views on his video channel and thousands of people have been so moved by his speeches, lectures, debates, broadcasts, that they have made over 10,000 videos available of his appearances.

These videos of Dr. Duke’s appearances, interviews, speeches and lectures now total over 300 million views. To illustrate the power and popularity of Dr. Duke and his message — his videos average a greater than 90 percent average positive rating from viewers.

Dr. Duke works for a new ethic for mankind against imperialism. No nation and no people, he argues, has the right to invade or control other nations for imperialistic purposes. Every people must have the right to self-determination and their own living space, whether through nationhood or autonomy within nation states, such as the Swiss model. He argues that every people can simply have the right to have communities that maintain their own expression of culture, heritage and values particular to their own soul and spirit.

No people, Dr. Duke says, should have the right to exploit other peoples. And, he maintains that globalism is destructive of every people on the planet and by its very nature is inherently undemocratic and oppressive. That Globalism is just a new and more horrific form of imperialist exploitation and tyranny, but this time on a global basis.

As exampled by Palestinian suffering and genocide, Dr. Duke believes that mass immigration against the will of its inhabitants is a crime against human rights, and argues that mass immigration also threatens many peoples today.

He points out that historically, practically every distinct heritage of people on the planet have had periods of imperialistic expansion, colonization migration and occupation. This is true of ancient Chinese peoples, African peoples, North American Native Peoples, Middle Eastern tribes, as well as religious imperialism and conquest by Judaism, Islamic and Christian entities.

Europeans too have had their empires and conquests,  its Crusades, but non-Europeans also had their own conquests of Europeans such as in Spain the the Balkans. Britain had Asian Colonies, but Asia had their own many versions of Attila the Hun ravaging European populations. Europeans developed advanced technologies and migrated in mass to the Americas in conquest, but Mayans had their own periods of imperialism over their many other distinct tribes and peoples.

The point is that migration has occurred with every people historically, and the clock cannot be turned back hundreds or even thousands of years. Still,  there is sound reason to understand these historical realities and to endeavor to construct an ethic on imperialism today that views it as unethical and against the most basic of human rights.

The modern day introduction of large numbers of different peoples in to a nation comprised of people of a different culture, heritage, religion, physical and psychological expression is a prescription for future conflict and often war and violence. Such has recurred throughout human history.

Dr. Duke urges us to understand and recognize human nature and not repeat the horrific mistakes of the past. Read his New Paradigm for Human Diversity and Freedom for more information on this subject.

Like many people all over the world who have devined their purpose from the soul of their people, and who have been protectors and advocates of their own people’s heritage, traditions, existence and freedoms, David Duke developed a deep love his own European heritage and that love shaped his early life. The controlled, Zionist-dominated media constantly headlines that David Duke was once a leader in a Klan organization.  They fail to point out that he has always been non-violent and he has always condemned any kind of violence.

No member of his own organization was ever accused of any violence toward different races. The Zionists who lead the attacks against him also fail to point that David Duke resigned from the organization still as a young man and that he has evolved to understand fully that the rights he seeks for his own people must be accorded to every people on earth.

As a person of European heritage he believes that it is his obligation to oppose any European exploitation or harmful acts against any other peoples, as he himself opposes any other policies that are harmful to his own heritage.

Ironically, the media still headlines his non-violent associations of over 35 years ago, yet lionizes men who promoted violence, and who had actually committed acts of bloody terrorism, such as Nelson Mandela. Notice the double-standard. The headlines for Mandela don’t read, “Former Terrorist Nelson Mandela.” The headlines don’t label George Bush, Jr. as “Warmonger” or the “Butcher of Iraq.” Bush’s lies and actions has resulted in millions of lives terribly harmed in unnecessary wars, but David Duke who has always been non-violent and who has never harmed anyone, is condemned for opinions in his early life while the Zionist press lets people like George Bush and Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel get away with murder.

You can be sure that if David Duke had gone on to be a typical pro-Zionist politician supporting the crimes of Israel, they would say he is an example of great man who can overcome his past! In fact, that fact is very true. He is great man who has overcome his past and all the vicious attacks of a Jewish-extremist media upon him. Of course, the real problem the Jewish extremists have with David Duke is not about his past, it is because of his formidable present. It is because they fear his wonderful words, and his brilliant message of human diversity, freedom and peace. that’s why they are relentless in trying to censor his videos, his writings and his books.

David Duke won the Vice-Presidential nomination for the Democratic Party in 1988 New Hampshire, and later Dr. David Duke was elected and  served from 1989-1993 as a member of the House of Representatives in Louisiana.

In 1996-2000 he was  elected to the ruling committee of the largest Republican Party district in Louisiana. He was subsequently elected (unanimously)by the other 13 elected members to serve as Chairman of the Republican Party.

In two elections in a state having the population of a typical European nation, as a candidate for United States Senator and Governor, David Duke received over 60 percent of the European American vote despite being outspent in media 40 to 1 in media  and having practically the totality of the political establishment against him.

The Zionists admit in their own books and articles that they defeated him in the election by economically blackmailing the people of Louisiana if they dared to elect him.  In 1992 Dr. Duke received double digit percentages of votes in some Republican Presidential Primaries.

Dr. David Duke is one of the best known American and World political figures and has been on America’s leading political talk show, Meet the Press, three times. and has appeared live on Today Show, NBC News, ABC News, CBS News, CNN, Fox News, the BBC, and many other national and international news and interview programs.

Considered an extremely brilliant speaker, after appearing on Meet the Press in 1999, Slate magazine headlined, How to Beat Tim Russet and wrote:

“David Duke beat Russert badly in March 1999, when he appeared on Meet the Press during his Louisiana campaign for a seat in the House of Representatives. Unable to stick it to Duke with his time-proven techniques, Russert sputtered, steamed, and almost boiled over.”

Dr. Duke’s defeat of Wolf Blitzer and exposure of him as former Zionist AIPAC official and “not an honest broker of television” was one of the most-watched CNN interviews in history. Dr. Duke has spoken in over 25 nations and at over 250 universities across the world.

Dr. Duke is a graduate of Louisiana State University with a BA in History. He pursued a PhD in the largest university in Ukraine and in 2005 completed his Doctoral Defense in Kiev where more than a dozen of the top academics of the nation of Ukraine participated.

Because David Duke dares to speak the truth about Zionism and the age-old, tribalist extremism that drives it — he has earned undying enmity of the Globalist media.

David Duke has earned the respect and admiration of millions of people all over the globe who can truly think for themselves and millions of people across the world see him as a sincere and extremely brave man.

Reading his writings and listening to him will convince anyone with truly open mind that David Duke is worldwide influence for human understanding, diversity and freedom.

If there is a chance for true human diversity and freedom, we must listen this amazing man and reach his prophetic words.

–Prof. R. A.  Johnson