Real Time Web Analytics


Sentencing Hearing Audio: Sentencing Hearing 4_14_16.mp3
Sentencing Hearing Transcript: Sentencing Hearing 4_14_16.pdf

New Filings <ENTER>

Trial Coverage and Commentary <ENTER>

4/14/16 – Today was a sad day for people in this country.  However most are not aware of it and many or most don’t really care enough to raise their voice or lift a finger. 

Judge Reed sentenced Thomas 1 to 3 years for threats of terrorism and 1 to 5 years for violation of home confinement.  These are to run consecutive.  There is no doubt in my mind that Thomas’s court appointed assistance of council Mr. Oshoway and Judge Reed were working together in their outcome based Just Us.

Thomas took the high road from day one.  He was not delusional. He knew the situation, opposition, and the dangers, but he persisted without compromise.

Thomas laid bare the big corporate club for all to see.  It is the same club that is attacking Donald Trump in his bid for presidency.  It is the same big club that George Carlin warned us about.  

Without removal of the evil corporate stranglehold on government and a turning away from evil of the people, there can only be an ever increasing decent into a hellish world.

From Wikipedia:

“A sentence is a decree of punishment. In law, a sentence forms the final explicit act of a judge-ruled process, and also the symbolic principal act connected to his function.”

Behold the corporate club in action.  The BAR (British Accreditation Registry) is a corporation.  Judge Reed has his corporation!  All branches of West Virginia and U.S. Government are incorporated. 

Judge Reed did rule in Thomas’s trial as Wikipedia states.  He ruled as gate keeper of evidence.  Judge Reed ruled what constitutional rights pleaded for by Thomas could be ignored. Judge Reed instructed the jury on how they must rule, and excluded the fact that the jury has the right and obligation to judge the law.

That the jury took slightly over one hour to reach their decision, speaks volumes as to the travesty of justice.  Had the jury properly realized the truth in this case, they would have handed Thomas a not guilty verdict.  That verdict would have forced the West Virginia Supreme court to deal with the issues of case 15-0419.  Instead of a total disregard for the rule of law, Thomas’s, Gene’s and my complaint would have had a proper hearing.

The overall interest in Thomas’s trial is indicative of the apathy, ignorance and conditioning of the people who are marching to the drum of the Corporate Machine. 

Incorporation of government, as bad and wrong as it is, a moral meltdown of the people is the very core of our dilemma.  Scripture say that “all nations that forget God will be turned into hell.”  John Adams said “We have no government armed in power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our Constitution was made only for a religious and moral people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other.”

Last night, I attended a candidate debate in Elkins, West Virginia.  Numerous candidates were asked to give their ideas on how to curb the monumental drug epidemic that no one disputes.  Not one candidate addressed the spiritual component.

Thomas, Gene, and I addressed in our Supreme Court Complaint, a major problem directly involving the spiritual component and its relationship to a total disregard for our State Constitution and the Rule of Law meant to protect Churches from state control.  The West Virginia constitution in Article 6 Section 47 prohibits church incorporation for obvious reasons.

Without repentance and turning from our wicked ways this land will increasingly be turned into hell and His people will be destroyed for lack of knowledge, Hosea 4:6.  Even worse than that, Scripture continues with God forgetting our posterity!

Was Thomas doing what is right in the eyes of God?  Conviction dictated that knowing what he knew, he couldn’t have done otherwise. He deserves much prayer.

I am sorry that the livestream that I thought I did at 11:00 A.M. after the sentencing was a bust.  After the presentation, I checked the streaming device which showed the bandwidth was insufficient.

With no apologies,





I took a road trip this week from Georgia to West Virginia with a couple of local friends, one a long time independent journalist covering stories of fraud and injustice in our government. The other his companion, a phenomenal and tireless talent at supportive research. It was my second trip with them in a month to a state where I previously had never been before. I wasn’t sure why I was going, I just knew I was led to go and help support a man whom I didn’t know, but who seemed to stand for what I believe to be true and just. My awakening to this subject began a few years ago, and has rapidly increased over the past year or more. Now, I’m ready to do what I can, so with the opportunity I chose to show up.

Once there, I sat for two days in a Circuit Court courtroom and acquired an education in local civics. What I learned was almost shocking to me, even with the knowledge I already had of the widespread government fraud in our country, knowledge the average working class American is not yet aware of. In this case, a circuit court judge insisted upon trying a federal case. Accountable to no one, he did as he pleased.

Thomas David, House of Deegan made history almost single handedly during the third week of March, 2016 in that courtroom. Charged with the crime of being a terrorist of the state of West Virginia, his trial and prior hearings looked quite different for him than did the end of his trial over the three days leading up to the verdict. The arrogance and tendencies toward disdain that showed up from one person then another towards him within the courtroom finally surrendered, and melted into respect for a man of apparent honor and compassion for humanity by the end of the trial. The judge and officers in the courtroom could not help but find him to be a highly intelligent and humble young man of 39 years of age. Having viewed him originally more along the lines of a crazed lunatic out to take over a state capital, they became unable to lack respect for him.

Between two separate sessions of meticulously shredding the under-oath testimony of state witness Trooper Kevin Williams, one of a group of troopers Deegan planned to cross examine for his defense, Deegan discovered that the detained troopers would have to miss attendance of a wake and funeral for a fallen officer on that day. Deegan chose at that time to give up his remaining witnesses. During the next recess he asked Judge Reed to release the troopers from their duty to his trial so they could attend the funeral. They were released as requested.

Trooper Williams had clearly written out a complaint, under oath, made up of opinion, past experience with “other sovereign citizens like him”, and nothing based on fact. He could not verify any dates, details or even specify what detailed actions his complaint was based upon. You couldn’t have written a better script that this one. It was just priceless.

Thomas was poised, calm, extremely focused, and if he missed any details, no one could tell. He was respectful to all, never arrogant, never accusing of his accusers, but rather he calmly played his role in the statutory law playground he was required to play his part in. He took the case apart with his defense, educated the jury and anyone listening about how government was designed to serve the people rather than the other way around as it now functions. He expressed his concern for all children, and charged all adults with allowing the current state of government through our complacency. He defined the words that make up the heavily used phrase sovereign citizen, which Trooper Williams used in his complaint to label Thomas and connect him with others the trooper categorized him with. One, he said, means in authority, the other means under another’s authority. Together, it makes no sense.

During the prosecution, Mr. Deegan had been accused of making terroristic threats on one particular conference call played for the jury. It seemed to be an urgent and blunt call to action, yes. However, that call to action followed years of legal study on his part, and hours of filings with the state court by he and two other educated and much older men, all requesting their state return authority in America to its rightful place, with the people. These legal documents were all unanswered and ignored by the state, time after time. At that point Mr. Deegan stressed his expectations of severe effects due to particular current affairs scheduled to take place soon after the time of the conference call. Was he seriously concerned for the future, or testing the group on his call, which according to the prosecutor was admittedly filled with federal agents.

This particular two hour conference call was played in full for the court at the request of Mr. Deegan, as was a full interview with a Canadian radio host that was recorded after the conference call took place. These two recordings together painted an amazing picture for all who listened to them. They did portray a man making a call to action against the state government system, and they also educated their audience to why that call was going out.

(Editor’s note: The youtube video of full interview with Canadian radio host Robert J. Morris, used as part of the state’s evidence may be viewed below.)

A beautiful thing took place within the trial, something completely unexpected by Mr. Deegan’s accusers. I found it thrilling to watch, and was honored to have the privilege to watch this scene play out within the courtroom, as the eyes of some of the members of the jury began to open. Some appeared to be in disbelief at first, as they discovered that their rights have been stripped away through fraud that has been taking place in our government unbeknownst to them for generations. A few jurors appeared to experience some degree of horror, while others still seemed dazed and clueless of what they were hearing, until the accusing witness’s testimony began to disintegrate before them. Others never got past the words in the recording.

The jury was offered the evening off if they felt time would be required to reach a verdict. One round of votes brought them back into the courtroom to accept the judges offer to start fresh in the morning. Clearly some eyes were opened and could no longer see his efforts as terroristic, while others were committed to the breaking of codes and statutes. In the morning, and after an hour or so of awaiting the call to reconvene, the jury returned with a guilty verdict.

Mr. Deegan has already begun to prepare for his appeal, so know that this is not the end of this journey. It’s only one leg of it. Probably the toughest project ever to take on will be the federal system of fraud and statutory regulation law, fashioned virtually at the bench.

During the hearing Thomas had the opportunity to share before the court each of his constitutional rights that he felt had been violated. Afterwards, I heard the judge say to Mr. Deegan, “your supreme law of the land is not recognized in this courtroom. This is how we’ve always done things and this is how we’ll do it.” During the trial, I heard him say that “the court interprets the laws”. Apparently case by case. Yes, it’s actually come to this. We’ve allowed it. For the non-believer, the entire trial and hearings can be heard on recording, online.

Considering the mere handful of people at the hearings and trial, who of us is willing to show up at all, to stand with this mission that has the names of every child and future generation on it? There was less than ten people in that courtroom in support of Thomas. We’ll have to do way better than that with some sort of effort as Americans if we’re ever to make a dent in removing the chains of slavery we have allowed ourselves to become bound by with our complacency and deliberate ignorance of what’s so. Stand before any judge and tell him you didn’t know. He will tell you that ignorance is no excuse, and you will face the consequences anyway. This is no different. Think about that. Explain it to your young. This is a call to action. The best place to start is to educate yourself. Explore Congressional documents, read the statutes. A little at a time, and then be seen at the local level asking questions and learning. And speak up. After you turn off the television for a while. What you see and hear there is only a fraudulent veil that’s been created to dumb us down and to deceive us.





This video consists of post verdict reactions for Thomas David House of Deegan trial given by Caleb Hitt and Dee Corley, moderated by Carl Swennson.





Carl Swennson interviews Dee and Caleb Hitt about their thoughts on Thomas’s first day of jury trial.

Further analysis of Thomas’s first day of trial by Carl and Heather Swennson, Dee, and what to expect for day 2.





I attended the jury selection earlier this afternoon for Thomas David House of Deegan’s trial in Parkersburg, WV.  However there was some drama during a morning motions hearing as Carl Swensson, a reporter from Atlanta, GA was arrested for having a camera pen in his shirt pocket!  According to Heather Swensson, two individuals (suspected feds) wearing street clothing with guns were sitting directly behind her and Carl, when some communication began stirring among officers.  The camera pen was confiscated, passed around for examination, until the bailiff alerted purported Wood County Circuit Court Judge Jeff Reed.

Judge Reed ordered, “Place that man in custody.”

Heather raised the question outside of the Wood County Judicial Building as to how these officers knew Carl’s pen was a camera as he did not try to hide it during security scan earlier before entering the courtroom.   Somebody obviously said something.

So, Carl was arrested while keeping tongue in cheek, and taken to the magistrate building for processing.  Heather later told how as she was sitting in her parked vehicle in front of the Judicial Building, three witnesses of the state (one of whom being a state trooper) smirked at her while passing by.

Carl was arrested for being in contempt of court, as Judge Reed has been very adamant in previous hearings that absolutely no recording devices may be brought into the court room.  The only exception has been for local news station, WTAP.  This is a direct violation of the 1st article of the Bill of Rights, which acknowledges the freedom of the press.

Judge Reed later called for Carl to be brought back into the courtroom by saying, “Go get that man.”

So, Carl was escorted back into the courtroom, where Judge Reed lectured him, and released him from custody.  Carl was also not allowed to come back into the courtroom, so he had to leave.

The question of whether the trial should be moved to another court shall be decided by the jury.  As explained in the video above, Thomas has previously pointed out the constitutional fact (article 3, section 2) that any time a state is a party in a case against a citizen thereof, the trial shall be heard in the Supreme Court.  Judge Reed has previously explained this off by claiming it’s a “tradition” of the courts to hear such cases.

So basically, the fact that it’s a “tradition” of the courts to violate the Constitution, this somehow makes everything ok!

Opening statements will be given tomorrow morning during jury trial which is expected to last through Friday.  Thomas is being accused by pro se, WEST VIRGINIA INC. of threats of terrorism.

Thomas, along with Phil Hudok, and Gene Stalnaker is at the forefront of an effort to change the current corporate form of government to a constitutional form in West Virginia. Recently Phil was part of an in depth discussion about the rule of law on Battle of New Orleans Radio.  Please check it out in video below. And for more exhaustive information/documentation about this effort and Thomas’s trial, please visit






Supporters of Thomas David House of Deegan erected a crime scene near the Wood County Judicial Building, located in Parkersburg, West Virginia.  In what was thought to be a jury trial for Thomas ended up being another pretrial hearing before Judge Jeff Reed in Circuit Court.  Afterwards, Pastor Butch Paul gave a death eulogy for America.  Other supporters who gave speeches included Phil Hudok, Carl Alfred, and Darlene Deegan.  Thomas’s trial is scheduled for March 15th.



George Orwell’s 1984 Arrives



2/22/16 Breaking Information on Thomas David House of Deegan:

It is with a heavy heart that I relay the following:

Those few people who turned out for Thomas on Friday, the 19th, witnessed, Judge Reed say “I can do whatever I want” and certainly he’s done it. 

Friday was supposed to be a hearing for continuance of revocation of home confinement charge for Thomas’s thought crimes for which Thomas he has yet to be tried. However, to the surprise of the prosecutor and the defendant, after the continuance was granted to March 15, it turned out to be a hearing on evidence and motions.  No motions by Thomas were objected to by the prosecution, but all were dismissed by heir Judge Reed. Since when is it supposed to be Judge vs Defendant?

However, Judge Reed, has outdone himself.  This morning, the sheriff hand delivered a letter from Judge Reed to Thomas.  The Judge informed Thomas that he will appear on March 1 instead of March 15.  Heir Judge Jeffrey B. Reed also notified Thomas that he has been found guilty. Heir Reed “don’t need no stinking hearing!”  The judge knows that only a handful of people give a rat’s ass.

Suspended constitution, private-for-profit corporate government, is case closed.  I wouldn’t want to be in Reed’s shoes when judgement day comes.

Pray for Thomas as the criminal establishment has plans that he will never see freedom again and I’m not talking about the incarcerated crowd as probably a larger percentage of them are more lawful than the purported government prostitutes. 

“Lord Come Quickly.”

With no apologies,


Purported Judge Jeffrey B. Reed
Wood County Judicial Building
2 Government Square, Room 221
Parkersburg, WV 26101-5353
Fax: 304-424-1726



Judge Jeffrey Reed

Purported Senior Judge John D. Beane  ( Threat of terrorism charge was transferred from Beane to Reed)
Fax 304-424-1846

Parkersburg 2_19_16 840x.png

Few are paying attention to what is happening to Thomas David: House of Deegan as he is being railroaded into prison on a “Thought crime” charge. Whether you understand or agree with his (Thomas) findings or his methods, this will affect every last one of you as this will establish the precedence needed to further demolish “Free Speech” in this land. From Georgia to California, people came in support and were horrified to see just how lawless this administrator (Jeffrey B. Reed) for the Wood County, West Virginia Circuit Court was acting. This was put on the docket as a bond revocation hearing but Reed (“I rule as I see fit”) decided to make it a motions hearing. Neither Thomas nor the Prosecutor had any idea this was going to happen so neither were prepared.

Of course that only matters if you have a legitimate court system which we, most assuredly, do not. Welcome to your “New World order” folks, where the law is whatever these administrators say it is and where their rules trump everybody’s rights.

Disbarred Esquire Barry Soetoro is busy working to kill your second amendment while Jeffrey b. Reed takes his que from the DOJ to eliminate your first.

The precedence being set is right out of the movie “The minority report” where prosecution for thought crimes becomes the norm. Your new norm.

And still, no one gives a rat’s behind because it hasn’t affected them. More are sure to suffer the same fate until action is taken against these foreign agents (BAR card carrying Esquires) that have now taken over the courts and this thing you call government.

Article 1 section 9 clause 8 and article 1 section 10 clause 1 are as worthless as you let them be. Because you’ve allowed this infiltration we no longer have a Union of Sovereign States.

Good job!

carl alfred




After much anticipation among supporters of Thomas David House of Deegan, his revocation hearing for home confinement arrived Friday, Febuary 19 in Wood County Circuit Court at Parkersburg, WV.   Close to 20 of us gathered near the Judicial building downtown.  Those among us included 2016 Governor candidate Phil Hudok, Pastor Butch Paugh, Darlene Deegan (Thomas’s mother), and others from West Virginia, Ohio, California, and Georgia.

During this time, Phil Hudok was handing out copies of an article he wrote entitled, “On Government Corporations: The Matter Of West Virginia And The Condition Of The People.”  Phil’s article was originally published in the Nov/Dec 2015 edition of The American’s Bulletin, and later with his permission, republished right here on The Daily Resistance.  This article is an eye opening expose of the fraudulent conspiracy of  corporations posing as government.  Carl Swenson, who would also moderate post hearing reactions, was handing out small sized American Peace Flags.

American Peace Flag

American Peace Flag

Per Phil’s request, everyone brought a copy of the Holy Bible.  After going through security, Pastor Butch instructed each of us to hold our Bible unashamedly high while entering the court room.  So we all did.  This was to signify our Heavenly Father’s highest authority.  Higher than even the circuit court.  Neither Administrator (Judge) Jeff Reed nor anyone else objected to this.

During the hearing, Administrator (Judge?) Reed began dismissing a series of motions.  Leonard, during his post hearing reaction commented, “…what I saw there was a lack of due process notification.  Thomas brought that up when he started to rule on these demands.  Their not motions.  There demands, let’s get that square.  But the judge referred to them as motions.  I think that is unlawful, number one.  Due process notification, what I’m referring to would be the fact they did not notify the alleged defendant in this case that they were going to be ruling on motions.  This was a revocation hearing, not to rule on motions.”

Indeed, as  Carl pointed out, “people came in support and were horrified to see just how lawless this administrator (Jeffrey B. Reed) for the Wood County, West Virginia Circuit Court was acting. This was put on the docket as a bond revocation hearing but Reed (“I rule as I see fit”) decided to make it a motions hearing. Neither Thomas nor the Prosecutor had any idea this was going to happen so neither were prepared.”

The 6 demands referred to made by Thomas centered around the court’s purported jurisdiction/authority.  Judge Reed dismissed/denied all of them.  Of course, Administrator (Judge?) Reed is not going to allow a platform for the truth to come forth regarding illegitimacy of the court.

As far as the charge against Thomas for threat of terrorism, the State’s evidence is tied to conference calls Thomas was involved with.  Thomas questioned his ability to review this evidence for himself because the military prison he is locked up in does not allow him to listen to discs containing the audio from these conference calls.  So now, an effort will be made by Thomas’s court imposed standby council, John Oshoway, to obtain transcripts of the conference calls.

Administrator (Judge?) Reed continues to refer to Thomas as the pro se, THOMAS DEEGAN, and also questioned Thomas on how he wishes to be represented. Thomas insisted he does not want anyone else to speak for him or represent him in any capacity.  Rather as Thomas put it, “I am presenting myself as the man that I am.” so as not to slide into the pro se corporate fiction role the court attempts time and time again to place Thomas into.  Thomas is a flesh and blood living soul.  The pro se fiction of THOMAS DEEGAN (notice all capitalized) is a corporation.  Thomas himself pointed out to Administrator (Judge?) Reed, the WV Supreme Court of Appeals accurately recognizes him as Thomas David House of Deegan.

To learn more about not only this corporate fiction of government and the court system, but also an overall briefing of Thomas’s ongoing battle, view this video of Phil Hudok’s interview with me on Battle of New Orleans Radio Show from a couple weeks ago:

Both Thomas’s and the State’s witnesses were absent from the hearing.  So Thomas did not object to the State’s motion to continue the revocation hearing as Thomas mentioned his desire to fully defend himself.  The revocation hearing has been continued for March 15, the same day as his trial for threats of terrorism.

All of the post hearing reactions given afterwards were very noteworthy as can be viewed in the video at the top of this page.  I picked out some for mentioning here though.  Phil Hudok mentioned, “Well, we saw a corporate system at work.  We saw a system that makes up there own rules.  And you have to submit to their rules.  And they are fiction.  They are not real.  We have a hijacked constitution, so we don’t have the rule of law.  We don’t have real men acting in both capacities as government, and in this case a defendant.  We have a real defendant and we have a fiction government.  And they want you to surrender to them.  They see Thomas as dangerous.  He’s dangerous because he’s exposed the system.  They feel they can’t possibly let him free, that they have to make an example out of him, and show this is what happens to anyone who goes up against the corporate borg.  This big club that George Carlin said that your not in.  And that’s what it is.  They have the money. They have the power.  They make the rules, and they don’t like anyone that challenges that.”

Joseph Cannon (of spoke next, “….He (Thomas) picked up on, ‘yea I am not a fictional character. I am a man created in God’s image’,…and it seemed to me the judge just kind of ignored that.  He didn’t really accept that idea.  He wasn’t going to accept any argument that Thomas did present.  He made a lot of good arguments…. Will the court accept it? No.  He is classified still as an entity and he is a danger to society.  Not to our society, but to the court system’s society.  And he’s a danger to the Illuminati, because he has exposed them for the game that they have played.  Thomas is not going to really play by their rules.  They want him to as I picked up on today… They got rules.  But as soon as he bows down to their rules, then he steps into their ballpark….”

Pastor Butch gave his take, “Well, I think the judge answered everything when he said, ‘I’ll rule as I please.’… So he therefore pronounced himself judge and jury.  The calling back of the constitution is not going to work because it’s not recognized.  So now we go back to the scriptures and stand for that or nothing.  The judge is going to ignore Thomas’s pleas as he did today motion to motion, thrown out, dismissed for whatever reason.  And they make up the reason as they go.  You know, if I played a ballgame, but if I made up the rules as I played, I’d win the ballgame everytime.  Well, that’s what they’re doing, and we needn’t kid our self when we’re up against a force here that is foreign to us as true Americans, and men and women of God.  But, it’s a power that now rules this earth, and now rules this country.

Carl brought up a good point when he said, “There was an instance there when he (Judge Reed) said to everybody, ‘You can’t record.’  And yet, WTAP was in there recording.  That shows a favoritism and contempt for anybody else other than his hand chosen minions.

Darlene Deegan was rather emotional during her reaction, “… And when I saw once again, that he Shanghaied my boy.  Not letting him get a word in edgewise, and doing whatever he so pleases because he’s made it perfectly clear over the past 6 years that, that is his court room and he makes the rules.  That was evident today.  And I was prepared to die today.  Because I knew with everything in my heart and soul, that as a mother, I’m tired.  I am mentally, physically, and spiritually drained.  And I knew if I didn’t leave that courtroom that they would shoot me dead in front of my boys and all of our friends because I truly could’ve done something that I could’ve regretted.  And I regret that I didn’t get to tell Tommy I loved him on the way out.  But I couldn’t go back into that court room, because I knew where my emotions were.  I knew where they were.  I just couldn’t stay.  But God will prevail in this.  I don’t know how He’s going to do it because He made promises to me and Tommy.  But I know Tommy’s going to get to come home as a free man.  And that’s what I’m waiting on.  He deserves it because God chose him for this, and He’s not going to leave him.”

Darlene then changed gears, “And I just want to say to all you people out there, you patriots that said you were Tommy’s friend.  All you people that he helped… I want you to know something.  My son is still sitting in jail.  Today’s day 150 for you… I really know who you are.  You see, if my son would have given up names, you’re names, he would be home right now.  So I want you to think about that…”

Carl in his closing statements said, “…But you know as I know, that what he’s doing, what he has done from the beginning, he has done in peace.  I have never, never heard him call for the violent overthrow of anybody.  What I’ve heard as you have heard is that these imposters, who are occupying offices that they were supposedly elected and appointed to, need to vacate those offices and let the people back into their House…”

View Carl’s closing statements in his video footage below.  (Note: my footage was cut off due to lack of storage space on my phone.) For more exhaustive information/documentation of Thomas’s case and the complaint filed by Thomas, Phil, and Gene Stalnaker through the West Virginia Supreme Court please visit

Below is a video exposing how the court system really works by tricking you into giving them jurisdiction over you.






Governments Usurped Into Corporations | Integrating Dark and Light ...

Governments Usurped Into Corporations | Integrating Dark and Light …



G. Carlin – “It’s a Big Club and you ain’t it.”
How did we get here (Corporate Government) from there (Constitutional Government)?  How did we fall from rights to privileges, laws to policy, men to fictions, masters to slaves? Three men, Thomas Deegan, Gene Stalnaker, and I, Phil Hudok were determined to know the truth. ( is our website with comprehensive documents and information)
Discovering that our own government has classified us as their enemies our entire lives, we were compelled act.  We petitioned our government for redress of grievances and breach of contract. Our government overlords would not answer which speaks volumes.  We filed a complaint with over a dozen writs of mandamus in the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals. The defendants addressed only one which is tacit admission of the others. The governor, attorney general, legislature, and eventually the justices placed themselves in default and dishonor.
Now, Thomas Deegan is arrested and jailed.  Take it personally!  You don’t have the Rule of Law and you are the enemy of your own government!  How did this happen?  This is the story.
We begin with some strong purposeful language from 143 year ago. West Virginia is nine years old and adopts the second and current constitution.
The Constitution of West Virginia, 1872:
Since through Divine Providence we enjoy the blessings of civil, political and religious liberty, we, the people of West Virginia, in and through the provisions of this Constitution, reaffirm our faith in and constant reliance upon God and seek diligently to promote, preserve and perpetuate good government in the State of West Virginia for the common welfare, freedom and security of ourselves and our posterity.
Article 1 Section 2, Internal Government and Police
The government of the United States is a government of enumerated powers, and all powers not delegated to it, nor inhibited to the states, are reserved to the States or to the people thereof.  Among the powers so reserved to the States is the
exclusive regulation of their own internal government and police, and it is the high and solemn duty of the several departments of government, created by this Constitution, to guard and protect the people of this State from all encroachments upon the rights so reserved.
Article 1 Section 3, Continuity of Constitutional Operation
The provisions of the Constitution of the United States, and of this State, are operative alike in a period of war as in time of peace, and any departure therefrom, or violation thereof, under the plea of necessity, or any other plea, is subversive of good government, and tends to anarchy and despotism.
Article 6 Section 47, Incorporation of Religious Denominations Prohibited  
No charter of incorporation shall be granted to any church or religious denomination.  Provisions may be made by general laws for securing the title to church property, and for the sale and transfer thereof, so that it hall be held, used, or transferred for the purposes of such church, or religious denomination.
What went wrong?  Most of our churches are incorporated and therefore government creations, under control of the IRS.  Political correctness is replacing God’s commandments.  The 1933 War Powers Act, did indeed make our constitutions, national and state, inoperative and made the people enemies of the government!  The high and solemn duty of the departments of government have failed us and continue to refuse to protect and guard the people of West Virginia from encroachments upon the exclusive rights so reserved. Our representatives no longer affirm faith and reliance upon God.  Instead they are creatures of private fictional corporate constructs, not government of, by, and for the people. “It’s a big club and you ain’t in it!”
It is very painful to learn that we have all been lied to from childhood.  However, only acceptance of the truth, followed by action, will set you free.  Thomas, Gene and I had our individual, rude awakening run-ins, with the corporate borg posing as “our” government.  It is not possible to completely plumb the depths of the rabbit hole, but I will give you the red pill of irrefutable signposts along the road to tyranny. Don’t head off unbridled.  The Divine Providence aspired to in 1872 is faith in God’s the righteousness.  Knowledge without discernment is deadly. We are in a spiritual battle.  Our land is in moral meltdown.  Being in total agreement with the Preamble, Thomas, Gene, and I, entered into the case file the entire Bible and cited specific applicable verses.
Gene, at 76, is the eldest of the three.  Gene’s awakening began in 1974-75 Kanawha County textbook battle which is documented in the book PROTESTER VOICES- A first time, first-hand protester account of the event that launched the fight for the heart and soul of America.  It garnered national attention.  Incidentally, the U.S. Dept. of Education had its beginnings shortly thereafter during the Carter Administration.  In 2008 Gene then became involved in a constitutional violation issue when he insisted that the State Treasury issue his tax refund in constitutionally mandated money. They would not/could not do that.
I am not too far behind Gene at 65.  I became active in politics and legal actions in the 1990’s with initial successes in the West Virginia Supreme Court in 1992 and 2000. I won in two important court actions involving the Randolph County Board of Education with whom I was employed as a physics teacher.  But in 1999, I and others began a battle over mandatory “face mapping” for a “driver’s license”.   After eight years of negotiations with the DMV and Governor Manchin, the Governor agreed to an accommodation.  That accommodation was rescinded by the succeeding Tomblin administration.  We have since discovered how the powers took the commercial operation of driver and applied it to travelers.  By slight of word, they redefined the word driver.  Around 2013 I became actively involved in the muzzling of churches via incorporation and I insisted the Attorney General honor his oath of office and enforce Article 6, Section 47, Incorporation of Religious Denominations Prohibited.  I produced two YouTube videos that the Constitution Party of West Virginia gave to many churches.  A 2013 personal battle ensued over state mandated compulsory vaccination of my daughter which I successfully tied up in court.
Thomas, is the babe at 39.  He has suffered most egregiously at the hands of a lawless government.  In 2010 when he was kidnapped and spent five months in solitary confinement.  It was kidnapping because he was forcefully taken without warrant (fourth listing down , on pages 11 to 13).  The state would have you believe is was strictly his use of marijuana which he had resorted to in a move of desperation having gone progressively downhill with a prescribed big pharma cocktail to treat the results of a serious automobile accident.  The side effects of the many drugs he was taking were probably enough to do him in.  Many are convinced that through a common enemy, Thomas and Gene were drawn together and through Gene, I got involved a couple of years later.  You may think enemy is too strong a term.  What else would call those who pretend to be your servants but act as masters using the heavy hand of government coercion, control, and outright tyranny against you?
There were two notable meetings prior to the beginning action of petitioning ten West Virginia Legislators on camera on February 24, 2015 that would be the first official action in our action in the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals.
July 23, 2014, Attorney General Patrick Morrisey held a “Town Hall Meeting” in Elkins West Virginia.    Mr. Morrisey was questioned on the church incorporation issue for which I had been assured two attorneys had been specifically assigned and DMV forced biometric identification. We received no satisfaction or subsequent response.
January 28, 2015 Gene, Pastor Butch, Pastor House, and I met with state attorney, Steve Travis, in the Capitol Law Library.  We discussed forced biometric identification, church incorporation, and facts and ramifications involving the 1933 War Powers Act.  Again there was no reply despite Mr. Travis’s multiple assurances that there would be.
On February 24, 2015 Gene, I, and a video cameraman when to the West Virginia Capitol in Charleston.  I personally served by hand ten legislators, a petition by Gene Stalnaker and me, Phillip Hudok, for redress of grievances and breach of promise document and an acceptance of their oath of office.  Most of these legislators were in key leadership positions.  We recorded handing them the documents and where possible the explanation of the purpose of the documents.  I explained that our constitution states that it is operative in both war time and in peace and that was violated by the 1933 War powers act. I also explained the purpose of our officially accepting their oath of office, thereby making it a contract between two parties.
There are links to the documents and YouTube video (See Filings & Responses – Petition for redress of grievances and breach of promise 2/24/15)
1. Using Legalese and Wordplay, otherwise known as Fraud, to work their way around the Intent and Factuality of We the Living Souls’ Sovereign Authority, Enabling Document and Contractual Terms to commit Fraudulent Financial and Terroristic Crimes against Ourselves and Our Fellow Brothers and Sisters.

2. Outright, Continuous and Flagrant Breaches of the Original Contract by our so called representatives who are violating their Duties, Obligations and Responsibilities as Public Servants and Public Trustees.

3. Aiding and Abetting of Foreign Agents by Our Public Servants and Public Trustees to allow International Money Changers, and their Agents, to Infiltrate, Destroy, Rape and Pillage, at will, under Threat of Unlawful Imprisonment and/or Death.

4. The Aided and Abetted Kidnapping of Our Children under various fraudulent and for profit commercial schemes.

5. The Aiding and Furthering of military tribunals to utilize foreign jurisdictions in Absolute Contempt and Breach of the Original Contract in collusion with foreign powers.

6. The Aiding and Furthering of the Unlawful Legislating from the bench of military judges and military jurisdiction in Absolute Defiance and Breach in furtherance of a Fraudulent Commercial Scheme.

7.  Placing Our jails and prisons under the control and authority of military tribunals, and the judges thereof, in furtherance of a fraudulent commercial scheme.

8.  Giving fictional entities endless authority and legal protection to rape and pillage Our Land, Environment and Fellow Brothers and Sisters.

9.  The Breaching of Contractual Oaths to support, uphold and defend that which permitted Certain and Expressed Authorities for the Securing and Protection of our Rights, Privileges, Freedoms, Immunities and Properties so Granted and Authored by God.

10.  Creating and blending of jurisdictions not expressly permitted by Our Original Contract to perpetrate Fraudulent and Violent Interactions.
11.  The Swearing and Affirming of False Oaths to attempt to legally evade the Public Servants’ and Public Trustees’ Contractual Duties, Obligations and Responsibilities. 12.  Unlawfully turning Our State over to, and under the authority of, a private, international body not contemplated, nor beholden, to Our Original Contract who are presently operating as the UNITED STATES and UNITED NATIONS. 13.  The legislating of so-called crimes not Expressly Permitted by Our Original Contract. 14.  Unlawful and Violent Intrusions into the Personal Affairs and Dealings of We the Living Souls’ Lives as we Pursue Our Lives, Liberties and Pursuit of Happiness as Authorized by Our Only authority, the Almighty Author of All.
1. The Immediate and Unconditional Public Affirmations, under Penalty of Breach of Contract, Perjury, Treason and Sedition, by Any and All Public Servants and Public Trustees, regardless of title, position and office, from the lowest to the highest, to Uphold, Support  and Defend the Original Contract Authorized by the Living Souls known as the Amended Constitution of West Virginia Ratified by We the Living Souls on the third day of May, in the Year of Our Lord one thousand eight hundred sixty two, and, in addition to the aforementioned, to Uphold, Support and Defend Our Unlimited and Inalienable Rights, Privileges, Freedoms, Immunities and Properties as Granted and Authored by the Almighty Author of All, without Exceptions and Conditions.

2.  The Immediate and Unconditional Public Severing, Voiding, Cancellation and Repudiation of Any and All ties and contractual obligations with, and to, the UNITED STATES and UNITED NATIONS, both of which are foreign and privately controlled corporations, and a Public Assertion of Absolute Compliance to the Constitution for the United States of America c1791.

3.  The Complete, Absolute and Unconditional Public Cancelling, Repealing and Rescinding of Any and All codes, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances, et cetera of the federal territory STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, State of West Virginia, West Virginia and its subdivisions, instrumentalities and creations, from the date of June 20, 1863 to the date of this Petition
We only received one email from a legislator stating that he was aware of the 1933 War Powers Act and he asked what we wanted him to do.  Our reply was to
bring up this fact on the House of Delegates Floor and sponsor a resolution to begin to remedy the situation.
Near the end of March, we served the same petition and acceptance of oath to the Governor via mail.  We served the State Attorney General and Supreme Court Justices through their representatives.
There was no reply from Governor Tomblin, AG Morrisey, or any of the Supreme Court Justices.  It is at this point that searching Dun & Bradstreet and Manta were producing unsettling but revealing connections which made our quest all the more important.
On May 22, 2015, Thomas David House of Deegan joined Gene and me in a 25 page Emergency Affirmed Declaratory Complaint, Ultra Vires In Law and Equitable Demand document filed in the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals. (See Filings & Responses- Filed Action in the Supreme Court of Appeals)
On June 5, 2015 The Supreme Court issued a Scheduling Order.  We were improperly addressed as pro se, and not as in propria persona sui juris.  Which meant that they wanted us pro se, or representing ourselves.  That would enter us into their fiction world of commerce not as the natural men that we are.  We are ourselves, we need not represent ourselves. (See Filings & Responses – Supreme Court Scheduling Order)
On June 12, 2015, we responded to the Scheduling Order with a Refused for Cause, Without Dishonor with ten statements consisting of one or more acceptances, denials, or declarations. (See Filings & Responses – Refusal of Scheduling Order for Cause)
On June 27, 2015, we filed a Notice of Default and Dishonor in Commerce, Admiralty, Equity, In Law, At Law and otherwise. The Defendants had failed by the own actions or lack thereof…  (See Filings & Responses – Notice of Default)
On June 29, 2015, we filed a Declaratory Judgment Demand.  Due to Default and Dishonor, we filed a Demand for Immediate and Unconditional Summary Judgment, Declaratory Judgment and Equitable Relief (See Filings & Responses – Declaratory Judgement Demand)
On July 2, 2015, we received a Response From Defendants. There were numerous inaccuracies and failings. Nearly all the Writs were ignored, and we were addressed again as both pro se and in all caps which indicates corporate fictions. (See Filings & Responses – Response from Defendants)
On July 8, 2015, we filed a Second and Final Notice of Default (See Filings & Responses – 2nd & Final Notice of Default)
On July 14, 2015, we filed a Proper Correction of Defendant’s Response.  This was to counter the defendant’s deficient, incomplete, and incorrect response.  We explained the definitions of kidnapping, and a definition and history of fictions among other things.  We cited postal regulation P030 9.13 and 10.1 which had been violated in their Certificate of Service mailed on July 2, but postage meter date stamped as mailed on July 1. (See Filings & Responses – Proper Correction of Defendant’s Response)
On July 23, 2015, we received a request from Daniel W. Greear, council for Steve Harrison, Clerk of the House of Delegates.  Mt. Greear, citing Rule 37, requested that we cease serving documents to his client at 105 Bradley Drive in Charleston.  However, both Dun & Bradstreet and Manta lists Steve Harrison as the Principal of the Virginia West Legislature.  And no, it is not the West Virginia, but the Virginia West Legislature with the W.Va. web address.
On July 28, 2015, we filed a refusal of Chief of Staff Greear’s Request for Cause.  Because his client, Steve Harrison, operates a business corporation from his home we will continue to serve him there.  We did make note that were he to dissolve the corporation registered to his home, and register it somewhere else, we would oblige.  Mr. Greear’s citing of Rule 37 was countered by Rule 2.  Under rule two, all rules can be suspended for expediency or any other good reason and since this was an emergency situation, we were invoking Rule 2.
On August 28, 2015, we sent James A. Hoyer, of the West Virginia Adjutant General’s Office and Mark S. Inch, US Army Provost Marshall General a notice and declaration and order to Effectuate Immediate and Unconditional Arrests and Removal of the three defendants being self-confessed criminals and outlaws.
On September 4, 2015, we filed an amended complaint which was read on camera outside the Clerk’s office. There were a number of additional entities
added as defendants including the Supreme Court Justices, the West Virginia State Bar, and others.
Interestingly, we found information that the State Bar is incorporated with the Supreme Court which is incorporated with the U.S. Supreme Court. It is a tangled mess of corporations.  We had subpoenaed a listing all public and private government corporations from the Secretary of State.  There was never a response to our subpoena.  At this point all state agencies were in default and dishonor and there was no higher court or authority.  All we were asking for was a return to the Rule of Law, government of, by, and for the people.  We now have corporate government and commercial law.  As you can see in our other documents on, we lost our country long ago.  Our bodies are now collateral for the nation’s debt.  We have been in a perpetual state of war since 1933 and the people are all classified as enemies.  We are governed by policy dictated by our servants turned masters.  The people fear the government and there is truly tyranny.  As Thomas can now attest, sitting in solitary, in the North Central Regional Jail, it is dangerous to be right when your government is wrong.
On September 5, 2015, Gene and Gene alone received the Supreme Court’s order of dismissal of Case 15-0491.  They cited consideration of the defendant’s joint summary response of July 2nd.
Never once was an order from the Supreme Court signed.  Go figure!  Who is going to tell the McDonald’s corporation how to run their corporation?   Public institutions can’t be corporations.  Corporate officers can’t be public servants.  Having county, state, and federal corporations is like having Obama in the White House.  Without having county, state, and federal corporations, we wouldn’t have Obama in the White House.  If you attend a church that is incorporated, what are you doing?
James 4:17 “Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.”  That is why I will not and cannot stop seeking truth and justice.  I am the Constitution Party of West Virginia’s candidate for governor in 2016.  I will use the opportunity to speak the truth as I understand it as often and as loudly as I can.  Upon election, the state’s attorney general will be instructed to begin a return to government of, by, and for the people!
What I have given you is only a snapshot.  The full picture involves international intrigue.  Will the people ever wake up?  Will the people ever understand that only a self-governing, moral people, can establish and maintain a righteous society?  Wasn’t it followers of the Bible given to them by their Creator that did establish the freest country ever?  Will the people ever give more than lip service to our most important founding document?
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.  That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.”

This article first appeared in Nov/Dec 2015 The American’s Bulletin.






Public law 87-297, the Arms Control and Disarmament Act signed by President Kennedy in 1961, calls for a ban on civilian firearm ownership and the United Nations taking control of the U.S. military.

“It is the purpose of this Act to provide impetus toward this goal by creating a new agency of peace to deal with the problem of reduction and control of armaments looking toward ultimate world disarmament,” the law states.


Section 2 states: “This organization must have the capacity to provide the essential scientific, economic, political, military, psychological, and technological information upon which realistic arms control and disarmament policy must be based.”  One of the primary functions it must be able to carry out is, “The dissemination and coordination of public information concerning arms control and disarmament.”

This sounds like an infowar waged against the American mindset as then U.S. Attorney Eric Holder in 1995 announcing a public campaign to “really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way.

Section 3: “Arms” and Disarmaments” meaning, “the identification, verification, inspection, limitation, control, reduction, or elimination, of armed forces and armaments of all kinds under international agreement including the necessary steps taken under such an agreement to establish an effective sytem of inter-national control, or to create and strengthen international organizations for the maintenance of peace.” 

We are obviously talking about an all out hardcore global take over here. The director of this agency shall be appointed by the President and act as primary advisor to Secretary of State and the President in regards to arms disarmament matters and shall have supreme responsibility for overall functions of the agency having assistance from an entire organization of committees, advisors, deputy director, bureaus, divisions, offices, etc, whom shall have required meetings with the President, Secretary of State, and the Director of Arms and Disarmament Agency.

Now by The Arms Control and Disarmament Act, we are not just alluding to gun confiscations of individual citizens but entire disarmament of entire national military capabilities! According to Title III-Functions, section 31, the Act states,

The authority of the Director with respect to research, development,and other studies shall be limited to participation in the following in so far as they relate to arms control and disarmament:

(a) the detection, identification, inspection, monitoring, limitation, reduction, control, and elimination of armed forces and armaments, including thermonuclear, nuclear, missile, conventional, bacteriological, chemical, and radiological weapons;
(b) the techniques and systems of detecting, identifying, inspecting, and monitoring of tests of nuclear, thermonuclear, and other weapons;
(c) the analysis of national budgets, levels of industrial production, and economic indicators to determine the amounts spent by various countries for armaments;
(d) the control, reduction, and elimination of armed forces and armaments in space, in areas on and beneath the earth’s surface,and in underwater regions;
(e) the structure and operation of international control and other organizations useful for arms control and disarmament;
(f) the training of scientists, technicians, and other personnel for manning the control systems which may be created by international arms control and disarmament agreements……
(k) methods for the maintenance of peace and security during different stages of arms control and
(l) the scientific, economic, political, legal, social, psychological,military, and technological factors related to the prevention of war with a view to a better understanding of how the basic structure of a lasting peace may be established
Prevention of war huh? Good luck with that one! In the Patents section 31, the Act basically calls for complete and total transparency of all research within the U.S. “shall be provided for in such manner that all information as to uses,products, processes, patents, and other developments resulting from such research developed by Government expenditure will (with such exceptions and limitations, if any, as the Director may find to be necessary in the public interest) be available to the general public,…”  What a crock! We all know the pristine transparency reputation our federal government has earned right?! 
Policy Formation under section 33 seems to call for some Constitutional and affirmative Congressional legislative check and balance for powers made unto the President.  This is pretty laughable.
In the Negotiations and Related Functions section 34, the Act basically designates the Director as acting under the Secretary of State authority as U.S. representative to communicate with other nations and international organizations in matters relating to arms control and disarmament. Title IV-General Provisions, General Authority section 41 outlines the agency working with a number of other government agencies and compensation generalities.
CONTRACTS OR EXPENDITURES SEC. 43. states, “The President may, in advance, exempt actions of the Director from the provisions of law relating to contracts or expenditures of Government funds whenever he determines that such action is essential in the interest of United States arms control and disarmament and security policy.”  This sounds like government spending and corporate fascism gone wild.
Security Requirements, section 45 basically calls for background investigations into any persons, officers, employees, contractors acting with the agency to make sure loyalty to the World State (Brave New World) is not in question.  The Atomic Energy Commission must allow open door access of any restricted data to any said agent working for the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency for compliance control purposes.
Public Law 87-297 Arms Control and Disarmament Act is based on the Department of State Publication 7277 Dtd 1961

 Some primary points from this publication are as follows:
First, there must be immediate disarmament action….  Second, all disarmament obligations must be subject to effective international controls….Third, adequate peace-keeping machinery must be established….
The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world which has achieved general and complete disarmament under effective international control;and a world in which adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
In order to make possible the achievement of that goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives toward which nations should direct their efforts:
The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force.
The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order.
The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to insure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.
As states relinquish their arms, the United Nations must be progressively strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international security and the peaceful settlement of disputes;
There would be a 3 stage disarmament.  In the first stage the nuclear threat, strategic delivery vehicles, arms and armed forces would all be reduced. Peaceful use of outer space would be promoted. U.N. peace-keeping powers would be strengthened. An International Disarmament Organization would be established for effective verification of the disarmament program. States would be committed to other measures to reduce international tension and to protect against the chance of war by accident,miscalculation, or surprise attack. 
The second stage simply calls for further development of steps already outlined in stage one.
During the third stage of the program, the states of the world,building on the experience and confidence gained in successfully implementing the measures of the first two stages, would take final steps toward the goal of a world in which:
States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N. Peace Force.
The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.
The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes.
The peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.
In Stage III progressive controlled disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures of international law would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force and all international disputes would be settled according to the agreed principles of international conduct. 

Since public law 87-297 was enacted, just about every president has worked to enact its provisions, including President Obama who signed a U.N. arms trade treaty which was rejected by the Senate.

“The right to own, buy, sell, trade, or transfer all means of armed resistance, including handguns, is denied to civilians by [Article 2] of the Arms Trade Treaty,” wrote Joe Wolverton II of the New American. “Article 3 places the ‘ammunition/munitions fired, launched or delivered by the conventional arms covered under Article 2′ within the scope of the treaty’s prohibitions, as well.”

Arms Control and Disarmament Act

Arms Control and Disarmament Act